Nomograms of Combining MRI Multisequences Radiomics and Clinical Factors for Differentiating High-Grade From Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the performance of clinical factors, FS-T2WI, DWI, T1WI+C based radiomics and a combined clinic-radiomics model in predicting the type of serous ovarian carcinomas (SOCs).MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, 138 SOC patients were confirmed by histology. Significant clinical factors (P < 0.05, and with the area under the curve (AUC) > 0.7) was retained to establish a clinical model. The radiomics model included FS-T2WI, DWI, and T1WI+C, and also, a multisequence model was established. A total of 1,316 radiomics features of each sequence were extracted; the univariate and multivariate logistic regressions, cross-validations were performed to reduce valueless features and then radiomics signatures were developed. Nomogram models using clinical factors, combined with radiomics features, were developed in the training cohort. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). A stratified analysis was conducted to compare the differences between the combined radiomics model and the clinical model in identifying low- and high-grade SOC.ResultsThe AUC of the clinical model and multisequence radiomics model in the training and validation cohorts was 0.90 and 0.89, 0.91 and 0.86, respectively. By incorporating clinical factors and multi-radiomics signature, the AUC of the radiomic-clinical nomogram in the training and validation cohorts was 0.98 and 0.95. The model comparison results show that the AUC of the combined model is higher than that of the uncombined models (P= 0.05, 0.002).ConclusionThe nomogram models of clinical factors combined with MRI multisequence radiomics signatures can help identifying low- and high-grade SOCs and a provide a more comprehensive, effective method to evaluate preoperative risk stratification for SOCs.