Comparison of clinical outcomes of Ibutilide-guided cardioversion and direct current synchronized cardioversion after radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Abstract

BackgroupIbutilide has already been used for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Ibutilide-guided cardioversion on clinical outcomes after individualized ablation of PsAF.MethodsFrom October 2020 to September 2021, consecutive patients with PsAF accepted for RFCA were prospectively enrolled. After individualized ablation including pulmonary vein isolation plus left atrial roof line ablation and personalized linear ablation based on left atrial low-voltage zones, patients were divided into the spontaneous conversion (SCV) group, direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) group and Ibutilide group according to different cardioversion types during ablation. The rates of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATT) among the three groups were evaluated after follow-up.ResultsIn this study, 110 patients were enrolled, including 12 patients with SCV, 50 patients receiving DCC and 48 patients receiving Ibutilide cardioversion after individualized ablation. Among the three groups, the SCV group had shorter AF duration {12 months [interquartile range (IQR) 12–16], P = 0.042} and smaller left atrial diameter (LAD) [35 mm (IQR: 33–42), P = 0.023]. A 12-month freedom from ATT rate was 83.3% in SCV group, 69.4% in DCC group, and 79.2% in Ibutilide group, respectively (Log-rank, P = 0.745). During the follow-up [17 months (IQR: 15–19)], the rate of freedom from ATT of SCV group (83.3%), and Ibutilide group (72.9%) were both higher than that of DCC group (53.1%, P = 0.042). Moreover, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly higher sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance in Ibutilide group than in DCC group (Log-rank, P = 0.041). After adjusting for risk factors of AF recurrence, the hazard ratio for AF recurrence of the DCC group with reference to the Ibutilide group was 4.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) (1.87–8.98), P < 0.001]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that freedom from ATT rate in effective Ibutilide subgroup was significantly higher than noneffective Ibutilide subgroup (Log-rank, P < 0.001).ConclusionFor the treatment of the patients with PsAF, Ibutilide-guided cardioversion after individualized RFCA may be benefit for maintenance of SR compared to conventional DCC, especially for the patients who are effective for administration of Ibutilide.