Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy

Published:2021-09-01 Issue:1125 Volume:94 Page:20201375
ISSN:0007-1285
Container-title:The British Journal of Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:BJR

Author:

Moro Francesca¹^ORCID,Esposito Rosanna¹,Landolfo Chiara¹²³,Froyman Wouter²⁴,Timmerman Dirk²⁴,Bourne Tom²³⁴,Scambia Giovanni¹⁵,Valentin Lil⁶⁷,Testa Antonia Carla¹⁶

Affiliation:

1. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia

2. Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Belgium

3. Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

5. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore,Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Roma, Italy

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

7. Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Abstract

The current review sums up the literature on the diagnostic performance of models to predict malignancy in adnexal masses and the ability of ultrasound to make a specific diagnosis in adnexal masses. A summary of the role of ultrasound in assessing the extension of malignant ovarian disease is also provided.

Publisher

British Institute of Radiology

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

https://www.birpublications.org/doi/pdf/10.1259/bjr.20201375

Reference60 articles.

1. Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience

2. Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective cross validation

3. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help

4. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer

5. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Unresolved pain in a middle-aged woman: an integrated family medicine approach;Cukurova Medical Journal;2023-09-30

2. Adnexal Mass Imaging: Contemporary Guidelines for Clinical Practice;Radiologic Clinics of North America;2023-07

3. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions;Diagnostics;2023-02-25

4. Diffusion-weighted imaging-based radiomics in epithelial ovarian tumors: Assessment of histologic subtype;Frontiers in Oncology;2022-12-05

5. The physiological sonographic features of the ovary in healthy subjects: a joint systematic review and meta-analysis by the Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SIGO) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE);Journal of Endocrinological Investigation;2022-11-24