Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress
-
Published:2023-11-29
Issue:23
Volume:24
Page:16903
-
ISSN:1422-0067
-
Container-title:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJMS
Author:
Nickoloff Jac A.1ORCID, Jaiswal Aruna S.2, Sharma Neelam1, Williamson Elizabeth A.2, Tran Manh T.2ORCID, Arris Dominic2ORCID, Yang Ming2ORCID, Hromas Robert2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA 2. Department of Medicine and the Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
Abstract
Replicative DNA polymerases are blocked by nearly all types of DNA damage. The resulting DNA replication stress threatens genome stability. DNA replication stress is also caused by depletion of nucleotide pools, DNA polymerase inhibitors, and DNA sequences or structures that are difficult to replicate. Replication stress triggers complex cellular responses that include cell cycle arrest, replication fork collapse to one-ended DNA double-strand breaks, induction of DNA repair, and programmed cell death after excessive damage. Replication stress caused by specific structures (e.g., G-rich sequences that form G-quadruplexes) is localized but occurs during the S phase of every cell division. This review focuses on cellular responses to widespread stress such as that caused by random DNA damage, DNA polymerase inhibition/nucleotide pool depletion, and R-loops. Another form of global replication stress is seen in cancer cells and is termed oncogenic stress, reflecting dysregulated replication origin firing and/or replication fork progression. Replication stress responses are often dysregulated in cancer cells, and this too contributes to ongoing genome instability that can drive cancer progression. Nucleases play critical roles in replication stress responses, including MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase, CtIP, MRE11, EXO1, DNA2-BLM, SLX1-SLX4, XPF-ERCC1-SLX4, Artemis, XPG, FEN1, and TATDN2. Several of these nucleases cleave branched DNA structures at stressed replication forks to promote repair and restart of these forks. We recently defined roles for EEPD1 in restarting stressed replication forks after oxidative DNA damage, and for TATDN2 in mitigating replication stress caused by R-loop accumulation in BRCA1-defective cells. We also discuss how insights into biological responses to genome-wide replication stress can inform novel cancer treatment strategies that exploit synthetic lethal relationships among replication stress response factors.
Funder
American Lung Association National Institutes of Health Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas
Subject
Inorganic Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Computer Science Applications,Spectroscopy,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Catalysis
Reference278 articles.
1. Avalos, Y., Canales, J., Bravo-Sagua, R., Criollo, A., Lavandero, S., and Quest, A.F. (2014). Tumor suppression and promotion by autophagy. BioMed Res. Int., 2014. 2. Another fork in the road-life or death decisions by the tumour suppressor p53;Carvajal;EMBO Rep.,2013 3. DNA damage-induced cell death: From specific DNA lesions to the DNA damage response and apoptosis;Roos;Cancer Lett.,2013 4. DNA damage response--a double-edged sword in cancer prevention and cancer therapy;Tian;Cancer Lett.,2015 5. Molinaro, C., Martoriati, A., and Cailliau, K. (2021). Proteins from the DNA damage response: Regulation, dysfunction, and anticancer strategies. Cancers, 13.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|