In Situ Strength vs. Potential Strength of Concrete: Proposal of a New Procedure for the Assessment of Excess Voidage

Author:

Pucinotti Raffaele1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department Heritage, Architecture, Urbanism, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Via dell’Università, 24, 89124 Reggio Calabria, Italy

Abstract

Concrete cores extracted from the same structural element may show variations in strength resulting from a lack of homogeneity and variations in the grade of compactness. This paper, while accounting for such variability, introduces a new formulation to assess both in situ and the potential characteristic strength of concrete. The first part addresses the Concrete Society report 11 on formulations and the formulation introduced by the author that considers new coefficients that take into account the addition of water to the cement mixer and the influence of excess voidage. The second part describes a case study in that the procedures were applied to an experimental campaign carried out on two series of cores. The visual means method proposed by report 11 is applied for excess voidage assessment to the first series of cores, while a computed axial tomography (CAT) scan allowing a direct estimate of the percentage of voids in different sections is applied to the cores of the second series. Results show noticeable variations in the percentage of voids within the same drilling. Moreover, the proposed formulation can estimate the actual value of both the in situ and potential characteristic strengths of concrete with a reasonable degree of approximation. Finally, a computed axial tomography (CAT) scan leads to extremely precise results, making it possible to evaluate the percentage of voids in different sections of the same core.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference29 articles.

1. Concrete Society (1987). Concrete Core Testing for Strength, Concrete Society. Technical Report No. 11.

2. (1981). Guide to Assessment of Concrete Strength in Existing Structures (Standard No. BS 6089:1981).

3. (1983). Testing Concrete. Part 120: Methods for Determination of the Compressive Strength of Concrete Cores (Standard No. BS 1881-120).

4. (1997). Nehrp Commentary on the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Standard No. FEMA 274).

5. (2003). Guide for Obtaining Cores and Interpreting Compressive Strength Results (Standard No. ACI 214.4R-03).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3