Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire

Author:

Genrinho Inês12,Ferreira Pedro L.3ORCID,Santiago Tânia4,Carones Adriana4ORCID,Mazeda Carolina25,Barcelos Anabela256ORCID,Beirão Tiago7,Costa Flávio7,Santos Inês1,Couto Maura1,Rato Maria8,Terroso Georgina8,Monteiro Paulo1

Affiliation:

1. Rheumatology Department, Tondela Viseu Hospital Centre, 3504-509 Viseu, Portugal

2. Rheumatology Department, Baixo Vouga Hospital Centre, 3810-164 Aveiro, Portugal

3. Centre for Health Studies and Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal

4. Rheumatology Department, Hospital and University Centre of Coimbra, 3004-512 Coimbra, Portugal

5. EpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal

6. Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA University of Lisbon, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal

7. Rheumatology Department, Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho Hospital Center, 4434-502 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal

8. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Centre of São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

Abstract

The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) was completed with five visual analog scales to assess systemic sclerosis (SSc) called Scleroderma HAQ (SHAQ). We performed a validation of the European Portuguese version of SHAQ for patients with SSc. Patients with different forms of SSc from five Hospital Centers were invited. The reliability of the Portuguese SHAQ was evaluated by internal consistency and by test–retest reliability. Content validity was checked by two rheumatologists and by a panel of patients. Construct validity was assessed by structural validity and by known-groups hypothesis tests. Criterion validity was addressed with selected dimensions from the UCLA GIT 2.0, the SF-36v2, and the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L. A total of 102 SSc patients agreed to participate, 31 of which answered to the retest. HAQ-DI demonstrated high internal consistency reliability (α = 0.866) and SHAQ also showed high test–retest reliability (ICC 0.61–0.95). We evidenced the unidimensionality of all VASs. HAQ-DI scores were worse in males, patients older than 65 years, and individuals with a diffuse form of SSc. Criterion validity was mainly evidenced through the correlation between the HAQ-DI and SF-36v2 physical summary measure (r = −0.688) and EQ-5D-5L index score (r = −0.723). Likewise, the SHAQ overall disease severity VAS was also correlated with SF-36v2 physical summary measure (r = −0.628). Mental score correlations were smaller. With the exception of the Raynaud’s VAS, all the other VASs correlated well with similar clinical variables. This paper provides evidence to demonstrate how reliable and valid the European Portuguese version of SHAQ is, to be used in SSc patients to assess the clinical severity under the perspective of patients.

Funder

Foundation for Science and Technology

Multiannual Financing of R&D Units

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3