Emerging Zoonotic Diseases among Pastoral Communities of Caia and Búzi Districts, Sofala, Mozambique: Evidence of Antibodies against Brucella, Leptospira, Rickettsia, and Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus
Author:
Oludele John1ORCID, Alho Pascoal1, Chongo Inocêncio1, Maholela Plácida1ORCID, Magaia Vlademiro2, Muianga Argentina1, Melchior Bibiana1, Isaías Telma1, Gatambire Aline1, Zimba Edna1, Nhavoto Emídio1, Notiço Paulo1, Inguana Pedro1, Cantoria Juma1, António Virgílio1, Monteiro Vanessa1, Ali Sádia13, Inlamea Osvaldo1ORCID, Samo Gudo Eduardo1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene 3943, Mozambique 2. Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo CP 257, Mozambique 3. Center for International Health, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80802 München, Germany
Abstract
Background: Emerging zoonotic diseases are an increasing threat to public health. There is little data on the seroprevalence of zoonotic diseases among pastoralists in the country. We aim to carry out a cross-sectional study on the prevalence of major zoonotic diseases among pastoral communities in the Caia and Búzi districts. Methods: Between January and December 2018, a questionnaire was used to solicit socio-demographic data from consenting pastoralists with the collection of blood samples in the Caia and Búzi districts of the Sofala province. All samples were tested using ELISA commercial reagents for the detection of IgM antibodies against Brucella and Leptospira. Likewise, IgM and IgG antibodies against Rickettsia and CCHFV were determined using ELISA kits. Results: A total of 218 samples were tested, of which 43.5% (95/218) were from the district of Caia and 56.4% (123/218) from the Búzi district. Results from both districts showed that the seroprevalence of IgM antibodies against Brucella and Leptospira was 2.7% (6/218) and 30.3% (67/218), respectively. Positivity rates for IgM and IgG anti-Rickettsia and CCHFV were 8.7% (19/218), 2.7% (6/218), 4.1% (9/218), and 0.9% (2/218), respectively. Conclusions: Results from our study showed evidence of antibodies due to exposure to Brucella, Leptospira, Rickettsia, and CCHFV with antibodies against Leptospira and Rickettsia being the most prevalent. Hence, laboratory diagnosis of zoonotic diseases is essential in the early detection of outbreaks, the identification of silent transmission, and the etiology of non-febrile illness in a pastoral community. There is a need to develop public health interventions that will reduce the risk of transmission.
Funder
Fundo Nacional de Investigação Instituto Nacional de Saude
Subject
Virology,Infectious Diseases
Reference40 articles.
1. (2021, July 10). Zoonoses. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/zoonoses. 2. (2021, July 10). Zoonotic Diseases. Available online: http://www.emro.who.int/fr/about-who/rc61/zoonotic-diseases.html. 3. Host range and emerging and reemerging pathogens;Woolhouse;Emerg. Infect. Dis.,2005 4. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases;Jones;Nature,2008 5. Gebreyes, W.A., Dupouy-Camet, J., Newport, M.J., Oliveira, C.J., Schlesinger, L.S., Saif, Y.M., Kariuki, S., Saif, L.J., Saville, W., and Wittum, T. (2014). The global One Health paradigm: Challenges and opportunities for tackling infectious diseases at the human, animal, and environment interface in low-resource settings. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|