Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review

Author:

Ventura Sara12,Ottoboni Giovanni1ORCID,Pappadà Alessandro1,Tessari Alessia13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 5, 40127 Bologna, Italy

2. Instituto Polibienestar, University of Valencia, Avd. Blasco Ibañez 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain

3. Alma Mater Research Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Bologna, 40121 Bologna, Italy

Abstract

Acquired motor limits can be provoked by neurological lesions. Independently of the aetiologies, the lesions require patients to develop new coping strategies and adapt to the changed motor functionalities. In all of these occasions, what is defined as an assistive technology (AT) may represent a promising solution. The present work is a systematic review of the scientific AT-related literature published in the PubMed, Cinahl, and Psychinfo databases up to September 2022. This review was undertaken to summarise how the acceptance of AT is assessed in people with motor deficits due to neurological lesions. We review papers that (1) dealt with adults (≥18 years old) with motor deficits due to spinal cord or acquired brain injuries and (2) concerned user acceptance of hard AT. A total of 615 studies emerged, and 18 articles were reviewed according to the criteria. The constructs used to assess users’ acceptance mainly entail people’s satisfaction, ease of use, safety and comfort. Moreover, the acceptance constructs varied as a function of participants’ injury severity. Despite the heterogeneity, acceptability was mainly ascertained through pilot and usability studies in laboratory settings. Furthermore, ad-hoc questionnaires and qualitative methods were preferred to unstandardized protocols of measurement. This review highlights the way in which people living with acquired motor limits greatly appreciate ATs. On the other hand, methodological heterogeneity indicates that evaluation protocols should be systematized and finely tuned.

Funder

European Union’s Horizon

Ministry of Universities of the Government of Spain

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference46 articles.

1. World Health Organization, and World Bank (2011). World Report on Disability, World Health Organization.

2. Adults with acquired traumatic brain injury: Experiences of a changeover process and consequences in everyday life;Strandberg;Soc. Work Health Care,2009

3. Barrett, D., Kamenov, K., Pearce, E., and Cieza, A. (2022). Global Report on Health Equity for Persons with Disabilities, World Health Organization.

4. Domains and determinants of quality of life after stroke caused by brain infarction;Kauhanen;Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.,2000

5. Mobile applications in an aging society: Status and trends;Plaza;J. Syst. Softw.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3