Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
Abstract
The development of materials and the products made from them should respond to new challenges posed by market changes and also by climate change. Therefore, the objective of this investigation was to develop a method that supports the sustainable development of materials and the products made from them based on an aggregated indicator of quality and environmental load in the life cycle (QLCA). The testing and illustration of the QLCA method included a passenger car tyre and nine prototypes. These prototypes were described using eight quality criteria: season, class, size of the load index, speed index, rolling, adhesion, and external noise. Then, customer expectations regarding the importance of the criteria and satisfaction with the indicators in the current and modified states were obtained. Based on the customer assessment, the quality indicators of the prototypes were assessed. This assessment was supported by the weighted sum model (WSM) and the entropy method. Then, life cycle assessment for the reference tyre was performed using the Ecoinvent database in the OpenLCA program. LCA indicators were modelled for other prototypes, taking into account quality changes. As a result of the verification of the method, an aggregated QLCA indicator was estimated, based on which it was possible to select the most favourable (qualitatively and environmentally) prototype out of nine. This was the P4 prototype (QLCA = 0.57). The next position in the ranking was taken by P7 (QLCA = 0.43). The QLCA method can be used to determine the direction of development of materials and products in terms of their sustainable development.
Reference73 articles.
1. Walker, S., Coleman, N., Hodgson, P., Collins, N., and Brimacombe, L. (2018). Evaluating the Environmental Dimension of Material Efficiency Strategies Relating to the Circular Economy. Sustainability, 10.
2. Obsolescence in LCA–Methodological Challenges and Solution Approaches;Proske;Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.,2020
3. Gajdzik, B. (2022). Frameworks of the Maturity Model for Industry 4.0 with Assessment of Maturity Levels on the Example of the Segment of Steel Enterprises in Poland. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8.
4. Fuxman, L., Delener, N., Lu, V., and Rivera-Solis, L. (2008). Preliminary Criteria Reduction for the Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. Evolution and Revolution in the Global Economy: Enhancing Innovation and Competitiveness Worldwide, Global Business and Technology Association.
5. Siwiec, D., and Pacana, A. (2021). Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations. Energies, 14.