Limitations of Protein Structure Prediction Algorithms in Therapeutic Protein Development

Author:

Niazi Sarfaraz K.1ORCID,Mariam Zamara2ORCID,Paracha Rehan Z.3

Affiliation:

1. College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60012, USA

2. Centre for Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK

3. School of Interdisciplinary Engineering & Sciences (SINES), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

Abstract

The three-dimensional protein structure is pivotal in comprehending biological phenomena. It directly governs protein function and hence aids in drug discovery. The development of protein prediction algorithms, such as AlphaFold2, ESMFold, and trRosetta, has given much hope in expediting protein-based therapeutic discovery. Though no study has reported a conclusive application of these algorithms, the efforts continue with much optimism. We intended to test the application of these algorithms in rank-ordering therapeutic proteins for their instability during the pre-translational modification stages, as may be predicted according to the confidence of the structure predicted by these algorithms. The selected molecules were based on a harmonized category of licensed therapeutic proteins; out of the 204 licensed products, 188 that were not conjugated were chosen for analysis, resulting in a lack of correlation between the confidence scores and structural or protein properties. It is crucial to note here that the predictive accuracy of these algorithms is contingent upon the presence of the known structure of the protein in the accessible database. Consequently, our conclusion emphasizes that these algorithms primarily replicate information derived from existing structures. While our findings caution against relying on these algorithms for drug discovery purposes, we acknowledge the need for a nuanced interpretation. Considering their limitations and recognizing that their utility may be constrained to scenarios where known structures are available is important. Hence, caution is advised when applying these algorithms to characterize various attributes of therapeutic proteins without the support of adequate structural information. It is worth noting that the two main algorithms, AlfphaFold2 and ESMFold, also showed a 72% correlation in their scores, pointing to similar limitations. While much progress has been made in computational sciences, the Levinthal paradox remains unsolved.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference94 articles.

1. Cyrus, L. (1969). Mossbauer Spectroscopy in Biological Systems: Proceedings of a Meeting Held at Allerton House, University of Illinois Bulletin.

2. Perspective: Structural fluctuation of protein and Anfinsen’s thermodynamic hypothesis;Hirata;J. Chem. Phys.,2018

3. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold;Jumper;Nature,2021

4. Pearce, R., Li, Y., Omenn, G.S., and Zhang, Y. (2022). Fast and accurate Ab Initio Protein structure prediction using deep learning potentials. PLoS Comput. Biol., 18.

5. ENCEPP: A program for predicting the conformational geometry of organic molecules;Corey;J. Comput. Chem.,1974

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3