Epidemiology and Clinical Insights of Catheter-Related Candidemia in Non-ICU Patients with Vascular Access Devices
-
Published:2024-08-06
Issue:8
Volume:12
Page:1597
-
ISSN:2076-2607
-
Container-title:Microorganisms
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Microorganisms
Author:
Scaglione Giovanni1, Colaneri Marta2, Offer Martina3, Galli Lucia1, Borgonovo Fabio1ORCID, Genovese Camilla13, Fattore Rebecca1, Schiavini Monica1, Taino Alba4, Calloni Maria4, Casella Francesco4, Gidaro Antonio4ORCID, Fassio Federico5ORCID, Breschi Valentina6, Leoni Jessica6ORCID, Cogliati Chiara4, Gori Andrea13ORCID, Foschi Antonella1
Affiliation:
1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy 3. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy 4. Division of Internal Medicine, Luigi Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy 5. Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy 6. Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Abstract
Introduction: Vascular access devices (VADs), namely peripheral VADs (PVADs) and central venous VADs (CVADs), are crucial in both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU settings. However, VAD placement carries risks, notably catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Candida spp. is a common pathogen in CRBSIs, yet its clinical and microbiological characteristics, especially in non-ICU settings, are underexplored. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective observational study at Luigi Sacco Hospital from 1 May 2021 to 1 September 2023. We reviewed medical records of non-ICU adult patients with CVADs and PVADs. Data on demographics, clinical and laboratory results, VAD placement, and CRBSI occurrences were collected. Statistical analysis compared Candida spp. CRBSI and bacterial CRBSI groups. Results: Out of 1802 VAD placements in 1518 patients, 54 cases of CRBSI were identified, and Candida spp. was isolated in 30.9% of episodes. The prevalence of CRBSI was 3.05%, with Candida spp. accounting for 0.94%. Incidence rates were 2.35 per 1000 catheter days for CRBSI, with Candida albicans and Candida non-albicans at 0.47 and 0.26 per 1000 catheter days, respectively—patients with Candida spp. CRBSI had more frequent SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 pneumonia, and hypoalbuminemia. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Candida spp. was a notable cause of CRBSIs in our center, underscoring the importance of considering Candida spp. in suspected CRBSI cases, including those in non-ICU settings and in those with PVADs.
Reference29 articles.
1. Central venous catheters: Which, when and how;Kehagias;Br. J. Radiol.,2023 2. Borgonovo, F., Quici, M., Gidaro, A., Giustivi, D., Cattaneo, D., Gervasoni, C., Calloni, M., Martini, E., La Cava, L., and Antinori, S. (2023). Physicochemical Characteristics of Antimicrobials and Practical Recommendations for Intravenous Administration: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics, 12. 3. Long peripheral catheters: Is it time to address the confusion?;Qin;J. Vasc. Access,2019 4. Femoral venous access: State of the art and future perspectives;Annetta;J. Vasc. Access,2023 5. Vascular Access Complications: An Emergency Medicine Approach;Simon;Emerg. Med. Clin. N. Am.,2017
|
|