Gut Microbial and Associated Metabolite Markers for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis

Author:

Alhhazmi Areej A.1,Alhamawi Renad M.1,Almisned Reema M.2,Almutairi Hanouf A.3,Jan Ahdab A.4,Kurdi Shahad M.1,Almutawif Yahya A.1ORCID,Mohammed-Saeid Waleed5

Affiliation:

1. Medical Laboratories Technology Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, P.O. Box 344, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 42353, Saudi Arabia

2. Seha Polyclinic, P.O. Box 150, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 41311, Saudi Arabia

3. Bioscience Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), P.O. Box 6900, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia

4. Abdulla Fouad Medical Supplies and Services (AFMS), P.O. Box 150, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 21414, Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, P.O. Box 344, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 42353, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of mortality worldwide. Considerable evidence indicates that dysbiosis of the gut microbial community and its metabolite secretions play a fundamental role in advanced adenoma (ADA) and CRC development and progression. This study is a systematic review that aims to assess the clinical association between gut microbial markers and/or gut and circulating metabolites with ADA and CRC. Five electronic databases were searched by four independent reviewers. Only controlled trials that compared ADA and/or CRC with healthy control (HC) using either untargeted (16s rRNA gene or whole genome sequencing) or targeted (gene-based real-time PCR) identification methods for gut microbiome profile, or untargeted or targeted metabolite profiling approaches from the gut or serum/plasma, were eligible. Three independent reviewers evaluated the quality of the studies using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Twenty-four studies were eligible. We identified strong evidence of two microbial markers Fusobacterium and Porphyromonas for ADA vs. CRC, and nine microbial markers Lachnospiraceae-Lachnoclostridium, Ruminococcaceae-Ruminococcus, Parvimonas spp., Parvimonas micra, Enterobacteriaceae, Fusobacterium spp., Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus-Peptostreptococcus stomatis, Clostridia spp.-Clostridium hylemonae, Clostridium symbiosum, and Porphyromonas-Porphyromonas asaccharolytica for CRC vs. HC. The remaining metabolite marker evidence between the various groups, including ADA vs. HC, ADA vs. HC, and CRC vs. HC, was not of sufficient quality to support additional findings. The identified gut microbial markers can be used in a panel for diagnosing ADA and/or CRC. Further research in the metabolite markers area is needed to evaluate the possibility to use in diagnostic or prognostic markers for colorectal cancer.

Funder

Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Virology,Microbiology (medical),Microbiology

Reference82 articles.

1. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040;Xi;Transl. Oncol.,2021

2. McGuire, G. (2015). Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization.

3. Ferlay, J., Ervik, M., Lam, F., Colombet, M., Mery, L., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., Soerjomataram, I., and Bray, F. (2020). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today.

4. Wild, C.P., Stewart, B.W., and Wild, C. (2014). World Cancer Report 2014, World Health Organization.

5. Introduction to the human gut microbiota;Thursby;Biochem. J.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3