Affiliation:
1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 7206), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 75116 Paris, France
2. Department of Psychology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
Abstract
In self-report questionnaires, men report higher scores than women on variables such as desire for sex, frequency of sexual thoughts, number of sex partners, etc. Based on this, men are considered to have a higher level of sexual motivation than women. However, retrospective self-reports may be unsuitable for estimations of the inherent level of sexual motivation. We review data on automatic (unconsciously controlled) responses and measures of implicit motivation during exposure to sexual stimuli. These responses and measures are inaccessible to willful manipulations and make it possible to determine whether the sex difference in answers to questionnaires is replicated when volitional response manipulations are unlikely. We complement the human data with observations from some rodent and non-human primate species. The attentional resources allotted to stimuli with sexual relevance as well as genital responses to such stimuli are similar in men and women. Measures of implicit motivation also fail to detect any sex difference. Finally, the frequency of masturbation is superior in female infants before the age at which social expectations begin to determine behavior. Neither in rodents nor in non-human primates is there any clear-cut evidence for sex differences in motivation. It seems that males and females are similar with regard to the intensity of sexual motivation. The responses to questionnaires may be affected by social learning of sexual scripts and/or the inferior quality of sexual experiences in women, among other things.
Reference210 articles.
1. Lancaster, R.N. (2003). The Trouble with Nature. Sex in Science and Popular Culture, University of Caifornia Press.
2. Is there a gender difference in strength of sexual drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence;Baumeister;Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev.,2001
3. Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social structural theories;Lippa;Arch. Sex. Behav.,2009
4. Sex drive: Theoretical conceptualization and meta-analytic review of gender differences;Frankenbach;Psychol. Bull.,2022
5. Orgasm in women in the laboratory—Quantitative studies on duration, intensity, latency, and vaginal blood flow;Levin;Arch. Sex. Behav.,1985