Immunogenicity of the Monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5-Adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine against XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 Sublineages: A Phase 2/3 Trial
Author:
Gayed Juleen1, Bangad Vishva2, Xu Xia2, Mensa Federico3, Cutler Mark4, Türeci Özlem3, Şahin Uǧur3, Modjarrad Kayvon4, Swanson Kena A.4, Anderson Annaliesa S.4, Gurtman Alejandra4, Kitchin Nicholas1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Ltd., Marlow International, Parkway, Marlow SL7 1YL, UK 2. Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA 3. BioNTech, 55131 Mainz, Germany 4. Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
Abstract
We report neutralization titer data against contemporary SARS-CoV-2 sublineages from an ongoing, phase 2/3, open-label, clinical trial of a single dose (30 μg) of an Omicron XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 monovalent mRNA vaccine. The trial included healthy participants who had received at least three previous doses of an mRNA vaccine authorized in the United States, with the most recent authorized vaccine dose being a bivalent Omicron BA.4/BA.5-adapted vaccine given at least 150 days before the study vaccination. In this analysis, Omicron XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 serum neutralizing titers were assessed at baseline and at 1 month after vaccination. Analyses were conducted in a subset of participants who were at least 18 years of age (N = 40) and who had evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immunogenicity was also evaluated in a group of participants who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 in another study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05472038) and who were matched demographically to the participants in the current trial. In this analysis, monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 vaccine elicited higher XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1 neutralizing titers than those elicited by bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2. Overall geometric mean fold rises in neutralizing titers from baseline to 1 month after vaccination were higher among participants who received XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 than those who received bivalent BA.4/BA.5-adapted BNT162b2 for XBB.1.5 (7.6 vs. 5.6), slightly higher for JN.1 (3.9 vs. 3.5), and similar for BA.2.86 (4.8 vs. 4.9). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05997290.
Reference23 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024, April 22). COVID Data Tracker, Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home. 2. Scott, A., Ansari, W., Chambers, R., Reimbaeva, M., Mikolajczyk, T., Benigno, M., Draica, F., and Atkinson, J. (2024). Substantial health and economic burden of COVID-19 during the year after acute illness among US adults not at high risk of severe COVID-19. BMC Med., 22. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2024, April 22). COVID-19 Vaccine Interim 2023–2024 COVID-19 Immunization Schedule for Persons 6 Months of Age and Older, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/COVID-19-immunization-schedule-ages-6months-older.pdf. 4. World Health Organization (2024, April 22). COVID-19 Advice for the Public: Getting Vaccinated. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines/advice. 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024, April 22). COVID Data Tracker. COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States, Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-booster-percent-pop5.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|