Looping Flexible Fluoropolymer Microcapillary Film Extends Analysis Times for Vertical Microfluidic Blood Testing

Abstract

The microfluidic measurement of capillary flow can be used to evaluate the response of biological samples to stimulation, where distance and velocity are altered. Melt-extruded multi-bored microfluidic capillaries allow for high-throughput testing with low device cost, but simple devices may limit control over sample flow when compared to the more complex “lab-on-a-chip” devices produced using advanced microfluidic fabrication methods. Previously, we measured the dynamics of global haemostasis stimulated by thrombin by dipping straight vertical microcapillaries into blood, but only the most rapid response could be monitored, as flow slowed significantly within 30 s. Here, we show an innovative method to extend both the stimulation process and flow measurement time without increasing the cost of the device by adding simple loops to the flexible extruded device. The loops enable longer time-scale measurements by increasing resistance to flow, thereby reducing the dependence on high stimulus concentrations for rapid reactions. The instantaneous velocity and equilibrium heights of straight and looped vertical microcapillary films were assessed with water, plasma and whole blood, showing that the loops create additional frictional resistances, reduce flow velocity and prolong residence times for increased time scales of the stimulation process. A modified pressure balance model was used to capture flow dynamics with the added loop. Looped devices loaded with thrombin and collagen showed an improved detection of blood stimulation responses even with lower stimulus concentrations, compared to straight vertical capillaries. Thrombin-activated blood samples in straight capillaries provided a maximum measurement zone of only 4 mm, while the looped design significantly increased this to 11 mm for much longer time scale measurements. Our results suggest that extending stimulation times can be achieved without complex microfluidic fabrication methods, potentially improving concentration–response blood stimulation assays, and may enhance the accuracy and reliability. We conclude adding a loop to low-cost extruded microfluidic devices may bring microfluidic devices closer to delivering on their promise of widespread, decentralized low-cost evaluation of blood response to stimulation in both research and clinical settings.