Perspectives on Clinical Adoption Barriers to Blood-Based Multi-Cancer Early Detection Tests across Stakeholders

Author:

Schroll Monica M.1,Quinn Elissa2,Pritchard Daryl3ORCID,Chang Allina1,Garner Amanti Kristen1,Perez Omar2,Agarwal Arushi1,Gustavsen Gary1

Affiliation:

1. Health Advances LLC, 101 2nd Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA

2. AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA

3. Personalized Medicine Coalition, Washington, DC 20036, USA

Abstract

Current United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations include routine screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer; however, two out of every three cancer cases occur in other indications, leading to diagnoses in advanced stages of the disease and a higher likelihood of mortality. Blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests can impact cancer screening and early detection by monitoring for multiple different cancer types at once, including indications where screening is not performed routinely today. We conducted a survey amongst healthcare providers (HCPs), payers, and patients within the U.S. health system to understand the current utilization of cancer screening tests and the anticipated barriers to widespread adoption of blood-based MCED tests. The results indicated that the community favors the adoption of blood-based MCED tests and that there is broad agreement on the value proposition. Despite this recognition, the survey highlighted that there is limited use today due to the perceived lack of clinical accuracy and utility data, high out-of-pocket patient costs, and lack of payer coverage. To overcome the hurdles for future widespread adoption of blood-based MCED tests, increased investment in data generation, education, and implementation of logistical support for HCPs will be critical.

Funder

AstraZeneca US Medical Affairs

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference44 articles.

1. An Update on Cancer Deaths in the United States (2023, November 08). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/research/update-on-cancer-deaths/index.htm.

2. Cancer Statistics, 2023;Siegel;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2023

3. The President’s Cancer Panel (2023, November 08). CLOSING GAPS IN CANCER SCREENING: Connecting People, Communities, and Systems to Improve Equity and Access, Available online: https://prescancerpanel.cancer.gov/report/cancerscreening/pdf/PresCancerPanel_CancerScreening_Feb2022.pdf.

4. Cancer Screening and Early Detection in the 21st Century;Loud;Semin. Oncol. Nur.,2017

5. The Burden of Asymptomatic Lung Cancer;Hanger;Eur. Respir. J.,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3