“Research Mentors Should Support Students of Color by Taking an Extra Step.” Undergraduates’ Reasoning about Race and STEM Research Mentorship

Author:

Vierra Kristin Dee1,Beltran Diana R.1ORCID,Denecker Lindsay2,Robnett Rachael D.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA

2. Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA

Abstract

Racial inequities and the adoption of a colorblind approach in education contribute to a situation wherein many academics lack the personal experience and incentive needed to identify and confront racism within society and institutions. This may be particularly the case in fields related to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), which tend to have lower levels of diversity compared to other fields. The current study examines undergraduates’ perceptions of whether STEM research mentors should consider race when mentoring students from marginalized backgrounds. We employ a mixed-methods approach with the goal of uncovering how undergraduate students perceive and rationalize research mentoring practices. Findings reveal that a strong majority of undergraduate students believe that research mentors should take race into account when mentoring students from marginalized backgrounds. During the qualitative coding process, the research team unearthed seven overarching themes that outline undergraduates’ reasoning, both in favor and against STEM research mentors considering race. We conclude by presenting an intervention intended to motivate individuals to redress colorblind ideologies and thus support a culturally sensitive mentoring style.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Administration,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Computer Science Applications,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference93 articles.

1. (2024, January 13). Charting a Course For Success: American’s Strategy for STEM Education, Available online: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Summary-of-2018-STEM-Ed-Stategic-Plan-Release-Event.pdf.

2. Acknowledging and supplanting white supremacy culture in science communication and STEM: The role of science communication trainers;Callwood;Front. Commun.,2022

3. Color-blind or racially conscious? How college science faculty make sense of racial/ethnic underrepresentation in STEM;J. Res. Sci. Teach.,2022

4. Evading race: STEM faculty struggle to acknowledge racialized classroom events;King;CBE Life Sci. Educ.,2023

5. Racial inequality in academia: Systemic origins, modern challenges, and policy recommendations;Dupree;Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3