Enhancing Student Engagement and Outcomes: The Effects of Cooperative Learning in an Ethiopian University’s Classrooms

Author:

Tadesse Tefera12ORCID,Ware Hashim3ORCID,Asmare Aregu4,Gillies Robyn M.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Educational Research, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia

2. Educational Development and Quality Center, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali P.O. Box 6955, Rwanda

3. Department of Civil Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia

4. Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia

5. School of Education, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia

Abstract

Based on social interdependence and social constructivism theories, the authors of this study examined the effects of a cooperative learning (CL) pedagogical model on the engagement and outcomes of undergraduate students in an Ethiopian university’s classrooms. We did this by using a quasi-experimental post-test control group design. The study participants included undergraduate students enrolled in the courses “Risk Management and Insurance” (n = 99) and “Foundation Engineering I” (n = 94). The control groups received regular lecture-based teaching, while the experimental group received CL instruction over two weeks in six to eight sessions. The results from the Management sample, which demonstrated that the CL intervention group reported significantly higher learning outcomes and more engagement than the control groups, are sufficient evidence for the study to validate the hypothesis. The effect sizes were moderate and ranged from 0.52 to 0.78 Cohen’s d. In the Engineering course, the results demonstrate the smallest difference between the mean scores reported by the CL group and those of the regular lecture group, with the CL group showing slightly higher student engagement and outcomes across the three categories assessed. The Engineering sample’s results, however, did not show any significant differences between the CL and control groups. This study provides evidence that course reform utilizing a CL pedagogical design could improve student engagement and learning outcomes as compared to the regular lecture-based method. By incorporating CL pedagogies, higher educators and institutions can create more engaging and effective learning environments for students.

Funder

College of Education and Behavioral Sciences

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference104 articles.

1. Förtsch, C., Sommerhoff, D., Fischer, F., Fischer, M., Girwidz, R., Obersteiner, A., Reiss, K., Stürmer, K., Siebeck, M., and Schmidmaier, R. (2018). Systematizing Professional Knowledge of Medical Doctors and Teachers: Development of an Interdisciplinary Framework in the Context of Diagnostic Competences. Educ. Sci., 8.

2. Assessing student learning outcomes internationally: Insights and frontiers;Coates;Assess. Eval. High. Educ.,2016

3. Krause, K.-L. (2005, January 21–22). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. Proceedings of the Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students, Townsville/Cairns, QLD, Australia.

4. Defining Student Engagement;Axelson;Chang. Mag. High. Learn.,2010

5. Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., and Whitt, E.J. (2011). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter, John Wiley & Sons.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3