‘I Just Don’t Trust Them’: Reasons for Distrust and Non-Disclosure in Demographic Questionnaires for Individuals in STEM

Author:

Goldshtein Maria1,Chiou Erin K.2ORCID,Roscoe Rod D.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Learning Engineering Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA

2. Human Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA

Abstract

Demographic data pertain to people’s identities and behaviors. Analyses of demographic data are used to describe patterns and predict behaviors, to inform interface design, and even institutional decision-making processes. Demographic data thus need to be complete and correct to ensure they can be analyzed in ways that reflect reality. This study consists of interviews with 40 people in STEM and addresses how causes of relational (dis)trust in demographic data collection contribute to pervasive problems of missing and incorrect responses and disobliging responses (e.g., non-disclosure, false responses, attrition, and hesitancy to use services). The findings then guide a preliminary set of recommendations for cultivating trustworthiness based on recent developments in trust theory and designing for responsive and trustworthy systems. Specifically, we explore how demographic questionnaire design (e.g., item construction and instructions) can communicate necessary reassurances and transparency for users. The ongoing research provides interview-based recommendations for improving the quality and completeness of demographic data collection. This research adds to other recommendations on improving demographic questionnaires.

Funder

Special Interest Group for Design of Communication

The Gates Foundation

National Science Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference66 articles.

1. Ajakwe, S.O., Nwakanma, C.I., Lee, J.M., and Kim, D.S. (2020, January 21–23). Machine Learning Algorithm for Intelligent Prediction for Military Logistics and Planning. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), Jeju, Republic of Korea.

2. Yang, Q. (2017, January 27–29). The role of design in creating machine-learning-enhanced user experience. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium Series, Stanford, CA, USA.

3. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor, St. Martin’s Press.

4. O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, Crown.

5. A survey on missing data in machine learning;Emmanuel;J. Big Data,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3