Risk of Motor Vehicle Collisions and Culpability among Older Drivers Using Cannabis: A Meta-Analysis

Author:

Chinna-Meyyappan Arun12ORCID,Wang Hui Jue12,Bawa Kritleen K.13,Ellazar Edward2,Norris-Roozmon Emilie4,Naglie Gary56,Herrmann Nathan178ORCID,Charlton Judith L.9ORCID,Koppel Sjaan9ORCID,Castel Saulo78,Lanctôt Krista L.1278ORCID,Rapoport Mark J.178

Affiliation:

1. Neuropsychopharmacology Group, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada

2. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

3. Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada

4. Canadian Cancer Research Trials Group, Queen’s University, 99 University Avenue, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada

5. Department of Medicine and Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada

6. Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

7. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

8. Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada

9. Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia

Abstract

Limited studies have investigated the effects of cannabis use on driving among older adults, who represent the fastest growing segment of drivers globally. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure on risks of (1) motor vehicle collisions (MVC) and (2) culpability for MVCs among adults 50 years and older. Three reviewers screened 7022 studies identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO. Odds Ratios (OR) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method in Review Manager 5.4.1. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute tool was used to assess the quality of each study. Seven cross-sectional studies were included. Three studies evaluated culpability while four evaluated MVC. The pooled risk of MVC was not significantly different between THC-positive and THC-negative older drivers (OR, 95% CI 1.15 [0.40, 3.31]; I2 = 72%). In culpability studies, THC exposure was not significantly associated with an increased risk of being culpable for MVC among adults over the age of 50 (OR, 95% CI 1.24 [0.95, 1.61]; I2 = 0%). Inspection of funnel plots did not indicate publication bias. Our review found that THC exposure was not associated with MVC involvement nor with culpability for MVCs.

Funder

Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation

Weston Brain Institute

Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Neuroscience

Reference56 articles.

1. Tomorrow’s Older Drivers: Who? How Many? What Impacts?;Burkhardt;Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board,1999

2. Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults;Anstey;Clin. Psychol. Rev.,2005

3. (2022, December 01). Office of Highway Policy Information Highway Statistics 2020, Available online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2020/.

4. The Prevalence of Age-Related Eye Diseases and Visual Impairment in Aging: Current Estimates;Klein;Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci.,2013

5. Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults—United States, 2016;Dahlhamer;MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3