Does Thinking in Opposites in Order to Think Differently Improve Creativity?

Author:

Bianchi Ivana1ORCID,Branchini Erika2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Humanities (Section Philosophy and Human Sciences), University of Macerata, Via Garibaldi 20, 62100 Macerata, Italy

2. Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Lungadige Porta Vittoria, 17, 37129 Verona, Italy

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the link between thinking in opposites and creativity. Thinking in opposites requires an intuitive, productive strategy, which may enhance creativity. Given the importance of creativity for the well-being of individuals and society, finding new ways to enhance it represents a valuable goal in both professional and personal contexts. We discuss the body of evidence that exists concerning the importance of the first representation of the structure of a problem to be solved, which determines the baseline representation and sets limits on the area within which a problem solver will explore. We then review a variety of interventions described in the literature on creativity and insight problem solving that were designed to overcome fixedness and encourage people to move away from stereotypical solutions. Special attention is paid to the research carried out in the context of problem solving, which provides evidence that prompting people to “think in opposites” is beneficial. We suggest that an extended investigation of the effects of this strategy in various types of tasks related to creativity is an interesting line of research to follow. We discuss the rationale supporting this claim and identify specific questions, both theoretical and methodological, for future research to address.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference181 articles.

1. Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review;Acar;Journal of Management,2019

2. What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking;Acar;Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,2020

3. The Impact of Type of Examples on Originality: Explaining Fixation and Stimulation Effects;Hatchuel;The Journal of Creative Behavior,2014

4. Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning;Alter;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2007

5. Altshuller, Genrich (1999). The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation, and Technical Creativity, Technical Innovation Center.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3