Characterization and Machine Learning-Driven Property Prediction of a Novel Hybrid Hydrogel Bioink Considering Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting
Author:
Sarah Rokeya1, Schimmelpfennig Kory2ORCID, Rohauer Riley3, Lewis Christopher L.2, Limon Shah M.4ORCID, Habib Ahasan2
Affiliation:
1. Sustainable Product Design and Architecture, Keene State College, Keene, NH 03431, USA 2. Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA 3. Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA 4. Industrial & Systems Engineering, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, Slippery Rock, PA 16057, USA
Abstract
The field of tissue engineering has made significant advancements with extrusion-based bioprinting, which uses shear forces to create intricate tissue structures. However, the success of this method heavily relies on the rheological properties of bioinks. Most bioinks use shear-thinning. While a few component-based efforts have been reported to predict the viscosity of bioinks, the impact of shear rate has been vastly ignored. To address this gap, our research presents predictive models using machine learning (ML) algorithms, including polynomial fit (PF), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF), to estimate bioink viscosity based on component weights and shear rate. We utilized novel bioinks composed of varying percentages of alginate (2–5.25%), gelatin (2–5.25%), and TEMPO-Nano fibrillated cellulose (0.5–1%) at shear rates from 0.1 to 100 s−1. Our study analyzed 169 rheological measurements using 80% training and 20% validation data. The results, based on the coefficient of determination (R2) and mean absolute error (MAE), showed that the RF algorithm-based model performed best: [(R2, MAE) RF = (0.99, 0.09), (R2, MAE) PF = (0.95, 0.28), (R2, MAE) DT = (0.98, 0.13)]. These predictive models serve as valuable tools for bioink formulation optimization, allowing researchers to determine effective viscosities without extensive experimental trials to accelerate tissue engineering.
Funder
National Science Foundation Award National Institute of General Medical, and Sciences of the NIH Award College of Engineering Technology-Rochester Institute of Technology College of Engineering and Science, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania
Reference86 articles.
1. Ng, W.L., Lee, J.M., Zhou, M., Chen, Y.-W., Lee, K.-X.A., Yeong, W.Y., and Shen, Y.-F. (2020). Vat polymerization-based bioprinting—Process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12. 2. Bioink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells;Chung;Biomater. Sci.,2013 3. Jessop, Z.M., Al-Sabah, A., Gao, N., Kyle, S., Thomas, B., Badiei, N., Hawkins, K., and Whitaker, I.S. (2019). Printability of pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 11. 4. Inkjet printing of viable mammalian cells;Xu;Biomaterials,2005 5. Predictive modeling of droplet formation processes in inkjet-based bioprinting;Wu;J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.,2018
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|