Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs. Open Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Comparison

Author:

Vincke Anna1,Miftode Sorin1,Alfarawan Fadl1ORCID,Bockhorn Maximilian1,El-Sourani Nader1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department for General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Oldenburg, Klinikum Oldenburg AöR, Rahel-Straus-Straße 10, 26133 Oldenburg, Germany

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Though widely used, only limited data is available that shows the superiority of hybrid minimally-invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) compared to open esophagectomy (OE). The present study aimed to analyze postoperative morbidity, mortality, and compare lengths of hospital stay. Materials and Methods: A total of 174 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in our surgical department, of which we retrospectively created a matched population of one hundred (HMIE n = 50, OE n = 50). Morbidity and mortality data was categorized, analyzed, and risk factor analyzed for complications. Results: The oncological results were found to be comparable in both groups. A median of 23.5 lymphnodes were harvested during OE, and 21.0 during HMIE. Negative tumor margins were achieved in 98% of OE and 100% of HMIE. In-hospital mortality rate showed no significant difference between techniques (OE 14.0%, HMIE 4.0%, p = 0.160). Hospital (OE Median 23.00 days, HMIE 16.50 days, p = 0.004) and ICU stay (OE 5.50 days, HMIE 3.00 days, p = 0.003) was significantly shorter after HMIE. The overall complication rate was 50%, but complications in general (OE 70.00%, HMIE 30%, p < 0.001) as well as severe complications (Clavien Dindo ≥ III: HMIE 16.0%, OE 48.0%, p < 0.001) were significantly more common after OE. In multivariate stepwise regressions the influence of OE proved to be independent for said outcomes. We observed more pulmonary complications in the OE group (46%) compared to HMIE patients (26%). This difference was statistically significant after adjustment for sex, age, BMI, ASA classification, histology, neoadjuvant treatment or not, smoking status, cardiac comorbidities, diabetes mellitus, and alcohol abuse (p = 0.019). Conclusions: HMIE is a feasible technique that significantly decreases morbidity, while ensuring equivalently good oncological resection compared to OE. HMIE should be performed whenever applicable for patients and surgeons.

Funder

publication costs by the Carl-von-Ossietzky-University Oldenburg

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. AWMF and Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (2021). S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus: Version 3.1., AWMF-Registernummer: 021/023OL, AWMF and Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie.

2. German S3-guideline “Diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric cancer;Moehler;Z. Fur Gastroenterol.,2011

3. Schröder, W., Gisbertz, S.S., Voeten, D.M., Gutschow, C.A., Fuchs, H.F., and van Berge Henegouwen, M.I. (2021). Surgical Therapy of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma-Current Standards and Future Perspectives. Cancers, 13.

4. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis;Klarenbeek;Dis. Esophagus,2020

5. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis;Harriott;J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3