RETRACTED: Efficacy of Intermittent and Continuous Subglottic Secretion Drainage in Preventing the Risk of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

Author:

Dewi Yulis1,Arifin Hidayat123ORCID,Pradipta Rifky1,Qona’ah Arina1,Rosita Rosita1,Giatin Cindy1,Dawod Kamel Gauda Amel45

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia

2. School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan

3. Palembang MediRose Publisher, Palembang 30154, Indonesia

4. Maternal and Newborn Health Nursing, College of Nursing, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ministry of the National Guard, Riyadh 11173, Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Maternal and Newborn Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt

Abstract

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is hospital-acquired pneumonia that develops 48 h or longer following mechanical ventilation. However, cuff pressure fluctuates significantly due to patient or tube movement, which might result in microaspiration. Subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) has been suggested as a method for VAP prevention bundles. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of subglottic SSD in preventing VAP. The secondary outcomes of this study are to investigate the intensive care unit (ICU) stay length and mortality rate regarding VAP. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science was conducted between June and August 2022. The study analysis used the Mantel–Haenszel method, and the quality of the included study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2. Eighteen randomized controlled trials with a total of 2537 intubated patients were included. It was found that SSD was associated with a lower risk of VAP (RR 1.44; 95% CI; 1.20–1.73; p < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis (utilizing intermittent and continuous methods) found no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.28). The secondary endpoints showed that there was no significant difference in mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI; 0.87–1.20; p = 0.83), but there were substantial differences in ICU stays (mean difference, 3.42 days; 95% CI; 2.07–4.76; p < 0.00001) in favor of the SSD group. This was based on a very low certainty of evidence due to concerns linked to the risk of bias and inconsistency. The use of SSD was associated with a reduction in VAP incidence and ICU stay length, but there was no significant difference in the mortality rate.

Funder

Universitas Airlangga

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3