Heart Failure Therapies following Acute Coronary Syndromes with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Data from the ACSIS Survey

Author:

Zafrir Barak1ORCID,Ovdat Tal2,Abu Akel Mahmood1,Bahouth Fadel3,Orvin Katia4,Beigel Roy5,Amir Offer6,Elbaz-Greener Gabby6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Cardiology Department, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 7 Michal St., Haifa, Israel

2. Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel

3. Cardiology Department, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

4. Rabin Medical Center, Cardiology Department, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

5. Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Cardiovascular Division, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

6. Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Heart Institute, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure (HF) may benefit patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Few real-world data are available regarding the early implementation of HF therapies in patients with ACS and reduced LVEF. Methods: Data collected from the 2021 nationwide, prospective ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS). Drug classes included: (a) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); (b) beta-blockers; (c) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and (d) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2I). The utilization of HF therapies at discharge or 90 days following ACS was analyzed in relation to LVEF [reduced ≤40% (n = 406) or mildly-reduced 41–49% (n = 255)] and short-term adverse outcomes. Results: History of HF, anterior wall myocardial infarction and Killip class II-IV (32% vs. 14% p < 0.001) were more prevalent in those with reduced compared to mildly-reduced LVEF. ACEI/ARB/ARNI and beta-blockers were used by the majority of patients in both LVEF groups, though ARNI was prescribed to only 3.9% (LVEF ≤ 40%). MRA was used by 42.9% and 12.2% of patients with LVEF ≤40% and 41–49%, respectively, and SGLT2I in about a quarter of both LVEF groups. Overall, ≥3 HF drug classes were documented in 44% of the patients. A trend towards higher rates of 90-day HF rehospitalizations, recurrent ACS or all-cause death was noted in those with reduced (7.6%) vs. mildly-reduced (3.7%) LVEF, p = 0.084. No association was observed between the number of HF drug classes or the use of ARNI and/or SGLT2I with adverse clinical outcomes. Conclusions: In current clinical practice, the majority of patients with reduced and mildly-reduced LVEF are treated by ACEI/ARB and beta-blockers early following ACS, whereas MRA is underutilized and the adoption of SGLT2I and ARNI is low. A greater number of therapeutic classes was not associated with reduced short-term rehospitalizations or mortality.

Funder

Israeli Center for Cardiovascular Research

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference28 articles.

1. Clinical practice. Systolic heart failure;McMurray;N. Engl. J. Med.,2010

2. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC;McDonagh;Rev. Española Cardiol. Engl. Ed.,2022

3. PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees. Angioten-sin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure;McMurray;N. Engl. J. Med.,2014

4. DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction;McMurray;N. Engl. J. Med.,2019

5. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure;Packer;N. Engl. J. Med.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3