Affiliation:
1. Department of Geological-Geotechnical Engineering, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
2. Ho Chi Minh City Institute of Resources Geography, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Mac Dinh Chi 1, Ben Nghe, 1 District, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
3. Data Science & Big Data Lab, Pablo de Olavide University of Seville, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
4. GIS Group, Department of Business and IT, University of South-Eastern Norway, Gullbringvegen 36, N-3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway
Abstract
Identifying areas with high groundwater spring potential is crucial as it enables better decision-making concerning water supply, sustainable development, and the protection of sensitive ecosystems; therefore, it is necessary to predict the groundwater spring potential with highly accurate models. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of deep neural networks (DeepNNs) and swarm-optimized random forests (SwarmRFs) in predicting groundwater spring potential. This study focuses on a case study conducted in the Gia Lai province, located in the Central Highland of Vietnam. To accomplish this objective, a comprehensive groundwater database was compiled, comprising 938 groundwater spring locations and 12 influential variables, namely land use and land cover (LULC), geology, distance to fault, distance to river, rainfall, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference moisture index (NDMI), normalized difference water index (NDWI), slope, aspect, elevation, and curvature. The DeepNN model was trained and fine-tuned using the Adaptive Moment Estimation (ADAM) optimizer, while the SwarmRF model employed the Harris Hawks Optimizer (HHO) to search for optimal parameters. The results indicate that both the DeepNN model (accuracy = 77.9%, F-score = 0.783, kappa = 0.559, and AUC = 0.820) and the SwarmRF model (accuracy = 80.2%, F-score = 0.798, kappa = 0.605, and AUC = 0.854) exhibit robust predictive capabilities. The SwarmRF model displays a slight advantage over the DeepNN model in terms of performance. Among the 12 influential factors, geology emerges as the most significant determinant of groundwater spring potential. The groundwater spring potential maps generated through this research can offer valuable information for local authorities to facilitate effective water resource management and support sustainable development planning.
Funder
Ministry of Education and Training (MoET) in Vietnam
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference99 articles.
1. The global groundwater crisis;Famiglietti;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2014
2. Plant-groundwater interactions in drylands: A review of current research and future perspectives;Wang;Agric. For. Meteorol.,2023
3. Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth;Fan;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2017
4. Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater depletion: A review;Bierkens;Environ. Res. Lett.,2019
5. Avila Velasquez, D.I., Pulido-Velazquez, M., and Hector, M.-S. (2022, January 6–8). Improvement of water management for irrigation in Mediterranean basins combining remote sensing, weather forecasting, and artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the Online Youth Water Congress: “Emerging Water Challenges since COVID-19”, Online.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献