Precautionary Saving and Liquidity Shortage

Author:

He Guohua1,Hu Zirun1

Affiliation:

1. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Abstract

Most of the canonical macroeconomic models simulate liquidity anomalies by changing the economic fundamentals or adding massive financial shock to firms’ collateral constraints, but a few facts somehow tell a different story. Instead of relying on the exogenous shocks, we introduce uncertainty into an otherwise classical liquidity framework and try to answer what worsens the aggregate liquidity in the absence of exogenous simulations and what a firm dynamics and financing strategy would be. Our analysis shows that (1) uncertainty induces agents to make decisions under the worst-case scenario and hence generates a unique expectation threshold that drags market (or firms) liquidity from sufficiency to insufficiency even without any shock or economic changes. (2) Precautionary saving occurs before the real liquidity shortage as the expectation shifts, causing firms to secure external financing by raising the equity issuing price and hoarding liquid assets, such as fiat money, against liquidity tightening. (3) To achieve liquidity stability and sustainability, an extra mathematical constraint is supplemented for the uniqueness and the existence of equilibrium under uncertainty. Other properties of firms’ intertemporal allocations, such as the bid-ask spread and return of holding of the illiquid asset, are derived. Moreover, some approaches for further empirical research are discussed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference30 articles.

1. Liquidity, business cycles, and monetary policy;Kiyotaki;J. Political Econ.,2019

2. Bachmann, R., Carstensen, K., Lautenbacher, S., and Schneider, M. (2020). Uncertainty is More than Risk–Survey Evidence on Knightian and Bayesian Firms, University of Notre Dame. Technical Report.

3. Blocks, liquidity, and corporate control;Bolton;J. Financ.,1998

4. The great escape? A quantitative evaluation of the Fed’s liquidity facilities;Eggertsson;Am. Econ. Rev.,2017

5. Guerron-Quintana, P.A., Hirano, T., and Jinnai, R. (2018). Recurrent Bubbles, Economic Fluctuations, and Growth, Bank of Japan. Technical Report.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3