Participants’ Bias in Disability Research on Family Quality of Life during the 0–6 Years Stage

Author:

Francisco Mora Carmen T.1,Ibáñez-García Alba2ORCID,Balcells-Balcells Anna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports Sciences, Ramon Llull University, 08022 Barcelona, Spain

2. Faculty of Education, Group of Research on Quality of Life, Health and Supports in Socioeducative Contexts (EDU-QoL), Universidad de Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain

Abstract

Background: Over the past two decades, various research teams have designed and applied instruments to measure the quality of life of families with a member who has a disability. A recent systematic review on the state of the Family Quality of Life in early care identified that many of these studies collected data only from the mothers. The present study aimed to investigate whether there is a bias in participant selection in these types of studies. Method: A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted in three databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Eric—from 2000 to 2022. A total of 72 empirical studies were identified. Results: The findings indicate that most studies examining the Family Quality of Life were based on the information of a single informant per family unit. The profiles of participants according to the research objective are quite similar. In one-third of studies, the authors reported that family members who participate cannot be represented by only mothers or one participant per household. Conclusions: Given the dynamic and collective nature of the construct, the application of a systemic approach is necessary.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,General Psychology,Genetics,Development,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference111 articles.

1. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). La Ecología del Desarrollo Humano. Experimentos en Entornos Naturales y Diseñados, Paidós.

2. Leal, L. (1999). A Family-Center Approach to People with Mental Retardation, American Association on Mental Retardation.

3. Bridging the gap from values to actions: A family systems framework for family-centered AAC services;Mandak;Augment. Altern. Commun.,2017

4. Verger, S., Riquelme, I., Bagur, S., and Paz-Lourido, B. (2021). Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Families Participating in Two Different Early Intervention Models in the Same Context: A Mixed Methods Study. Front. Psychol., 12.

5. Participatory Data Analysis: A Step Too Far?;Nind;Qual. Res.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3