Performance Evaluation of Automated Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) Analyzers in a Multicentric Study

Author:

Tomassetti Flaminia12ORCID,Calabrese Cinzia12,Bertani Fabio3,Cennamo Michele34,Diamanti Daniela5ORCID,Giovannelli Alfredo12,Guerranti Roberto6,Leoncini Roberto6,Lorubbio Maria7ORCID,Ognibene Agostino7ORCID,Nicolai Eleonora1ORCID,Pelagalli Martina12ORCID,Pieroni Carolina5ORCID,Bernardini Sergio12,Pieri Massimo12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy

2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy

3. Clinical Pathology and Microbiology Unit, Laboratory Analysis, ASST Lariana, Hospital Sant’Anna, 22100 Como, Italy

4. Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80126 Naples, Italy

5. Research and Development Department, DIESSE Diagnostica Senese S.p.A., Monteriggioni, 53035 Siena, Italy

6. Clinical Pathology Unit, Innovation, Experimentation and Clinical and Translational Research Department, University Hospital of S. Maria alle Scotte of Siena, Viale Mario Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy

7. Chemical-Clinical Analysis Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Transfusion, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy

Abstract

Background: Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) is an easy test used to diagnose and monitor inflammatory and infectious diseases. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the performance of three ESR automated analyzers, VES-MATIC 5, CUBE 30 TOUCH, and MINI-CUBE, involving four Italian polyclinics in Rome, Siena, Como, and Arezzo, as well as inter-site variability assessment to detect possible device-dependent and operator-dependent influences. Methods: Accuracy analysis was carried out by analyzing the same samples with all three instruments and comparing them with the Westergren method. Precision was assessed with quality control material through intra-run and inter-run precision. Repeatability was estimated by reanalyzing fresh blood samples belonging to three ESR ranges (low, intermediate, and high) six times. Results: The results showed a strong correlation (Spearman coefficients R2) between the manual method and VES-MATIC 5 (0.978), CUBE 30 TOUCH (0.981), and MINI-CUBE (0.974). The accuracy of all clinics was excellent, with coefficients of variation (CVs) of less than 10% for all instruments. Repeatability confirmed an excellent level for all ESR ranges, with CVs below 10%. Conclusions: The study proved that all three automated instruments offer optimal performance for accuracy and precision and are suitable for both large and small facilities without influences of the laboratory environment.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3