Feasibility of Tear Meniscus Height Measurements Obtained with a Smartphone-Attachable Portable Device and Agreement of the Results with Standard Slit Lamp Examination

Author:

Borselli Massimiliano1ORCID,Toro Mario Damiano23ORCID,Rossi Costanza1,Taloni Andrea1,Khemlani Rohan45,Nakayama Shintato46,Nishimura Hiroki46ORCID,Shimizu Eisuke46ORCID,Scorcia Vincenzo1ORCID,Giannaccare Giuseppe7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy

2. Department of Ophthalmology, Federico II University Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy

3. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland

4. OUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan

5. Yokohama Keiai Eye Clinic, Yokohama 240-0065, Japan

6. Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-0016, Japan

7. Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a novel device, the Smart Eye Camera (SEC), for assessing tear meniscus height (TMH) after fluorescein staining and the agreement of the results with measurements obtained using standard slit lamp examination. Methods: TMH was assessed using both SEC and conventional slit lamp examination. The images were analyzed using the software ImageJ 1.53t (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). A common measurement unit scale was established based on a paper strip, which was used as a calibration marker to convert pixels into metric scale. A color threshold was applied using uniform parameters for brightness, saturation, and hue. The images were then binarized to black and white to enhance the representation of the tear menisci. A 2 mm area around the upper and lower meniscus in the central eye lid zone was selected and magnified 3200 times to facilitate manual measurement. The values obtained using SEC were compared with those obtained with a slit lamp. Results: The upper and lower TMH values measured using the SEC were not statistically different from those obtained with a slit lamp (0.209 ± 0.073 mm vs. 0.235 ± 0.085, p = 0.073, and 0.297 ± 0.168 vs. 0.260 ± 0.173, p = 0.275, respectively). The results of Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated strong agreement between the two instruments, with a mean bias of −0.016 mm (agreement limits: −0.117 to 0.145 mm) for upper TMH and 0.031 mm (agreement limits: −0.306 to 0.368 mm) for lower TMH. Conclusions: The SEC demonstrated sufficient validity and reliability for assessing TMH in healthy eyes in a clinical setting, demonstrating concordance with the conventional slit lamp examination.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3