Cell Count Differentials by Cytomorphology and Next-Generation Flow Cytometry in Bone Marrow Aspirate: An Evidence-Based Approach

Author:

Ríos-Tamayo Rafael12ORCID,Sánchez María José2345ORCID,Gómez-Rojas Sandra6,Rodríguez-Barranco Miguel4ORCID,Segura Gloria Pérez6,Redondo-Sánchez Daniel4ORCID,CARREÑO-TARRAGONA Gonzalo6ORCID,Nicolás Antonio Rodríguez37,Ruiz-Cabello Francisco37ORCID,Jiménez Pilar37,Alonso Rafael6,Lahuerta Juan José6ORCID,Martínez-López Joaquín6ORCID,Duarte Rafael F.1

Affiliation:

1. Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain

2. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain

3. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (Ibs.GRANADA), 18014 Granada, Spain

4. Registro de Cáncer de Granada, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), 18080 Granada, Spain

5. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain

6. Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain

7. Immunology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain

Abstract

Despite a lack of evidence, a bone marrow aspirate differential of 500 cells is commonly used in the clinical setting. We aimed to test the performance of 200-cell counts for daily hematological workup. In total, 660 consecutive samples were analyzed recording differentials at 200 and 500 cells. Additionally, immunophenotype results and preanalytical issues were also evaluated. Clinical and statistical differences between both cutoffs and both methods were checked. An independent control group of 122 patients was included. All comparisons between both cutoffs and both methods for all relevant types of cells did not show statistically significant differences. No significant diagnostic discrepancies were demonstrated in the contingency table analysis. This is a real-life study, and some limitations may be pointed out, such as a different sample sizes according to the type of cell in the immunophenotype analysis, the lack of standardization of some preanalytical events, and the relatively small sample size of the control group. The comparisons of differentials by morphology on 200 and 500 cells, as well as by morphology (both cutoffs) and by immunophenotype, are equivalent from the clinical and statistical point of view. The preanalytical issues play a critical role in the assessment of bone marrow aspirate samples.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Reference18 articles.

1. Bone marrow aspiration;Bain;J. Clin. Pathol.,2001

2. The bone marrow aspirate of healthy subjects;Bain;Br. J. Haematol.,1996

3. Reevaluation of reference values for bone marrow differential counts in 236 healthy bone marrow donors;Parmentier;Ann. Hematol.,2020

4. Jandl, J.H. (1996). Blood: Textbook of Hematology, Little Brown. [2nd ed.].

5. Osorio, G. (1996). Técnicas y Procedimientos de Laboratorio, Mediterráneo.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3