Mental Health Experts as Objects of Epistemic Injustice—The Case of Autism Spectrum Condition

Author:

Wodziński Maciej12,Moskalewicz Marcin134ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Philosophy, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, M. Curie-Skłodowska sq. 4, 20-031 Lublin, Poland

2. Doctoral School of Humanities, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Weteranów 18, 20-038 Lublin, Poland

3. Philosophy of Mental Health Unit, Department of Social Sciences and the Humanities, Poznan University of Medical Science, Rokietnicka 7, 60-806 Poznan, Poland

4. Phenomenological Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Clinic, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 4, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

This theoretical paper addresses the issue of epistemic injustice with particular reference to autism. Injustice is epistemic when harm is performed without adequate reason and is caused by or related to access to knowledge production and processing, e.g., concerning racial or ethnic minorities or patients. The paper argues that both mental health service users and providers can be subject to epistemic injustice. Cognitive diagnostic errors often appear when complex decisions are made in a limited timeframe. In those situations, the socially dominant ways of thinking about mental disorders and half-automated and operationalized diagnostic paradigms imprint on experts’ decision-making processes. Recently, analyses have focused on how power operates in the service user–provider relationship. It was observed that cognitive injustice inflicts on patients through the lack of consideration of their first-person perspectives, denial of epistemic authority, and even epistemic subject status, among others. This paper shifts focus toward health professionals as rarely considered objects of epistemic injustice. Epistemic injustice affects mental health providers by harming their access to and use of knowledge in their professional activities, thus affecting the reliability of their diagnostic assessments.

Funder

Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education

Research Ethics Committee of Maria Sklodowska-Curie University

Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

Reference112 articles.

1. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice, Oxford University Press.

2. Fricker, M. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, Routledge.

3. The Legitimacy of User Knowledge in Decision-Making Processes in Mental Health Care: An Analysis of Epistemic Injustice;Grim;J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health,2019

4. Epistemic Exploitation;Berenstain;Ergo Open Access J. Philos.,2016

5. Epistemic Oppression and Ableism in Bioethics;Wieseler;Hypatia,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3