Proposal for a Battery to Evaluate Functional Capacity in Older Adults with Disabilities
Author:
Ascondo Josu1, Llodio Iñaki123ORCID, Marcos-Rivero Bingen12ORCID, Granados Cristina123ORCID, Romero Sheila4ORCID, Iturricastillo Aitor123ORCID, Yanci Javier12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Society, Sports and Physical Exercise Research Group (GIKAFIT), Physical Education and Sport Department, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain 2. Research Group in Physical Activity, Physical Exercise and Sport (AKTIBOki), Physical Education and Sport Department, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain 3. Physical Activity, Exercise, and Health Group, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain 4. Disability Research Department, GaituzSport Foundation, 48003 Bilbao, Spain
Abstract
The purpose was to design and validate a battery of physical tests, called EFEPD-1.0, adapted to assess functionality in people with disabilities. In addition, we sought to analyze the validity and reliability of this battery both for the total group and differentiated by sex. A total of 43 adults with disabilities (32 women and 11 men) participated (57.11 ± 10.12 years). The battery was composed of five blocks of functionality: neuromuscular, combined actions, acceleration, balance, and cardiovascular. The neuromuscular functionality was measured by the vertical and horizontal jump test using the optical system (Opto Jump Next®, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) as well as the Hand Grip (HG) test using a (5030J1, Jamar®, Sammons Preston, Inc, Nottinghamshire, UK) hand dynamometer. The combined actions and balance functionality were assessed with the Time Up and Go (TUG) test, the 30 s Chair Stand (30CTS) test, and the One-Leg Stance (OLS) test measured by a manual stopwatch (HS-80TW-1EF, Casio®, Tokyo, Japan). The acceleration functionality was evaluated through 20 m sprints and the 505 change of direction (COD505) test, using the (Microgate, Witty®, Bolzano, Italy) photocell system. The cardiovascular functionality was evaluated with the Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT), where heart rate was monitored using the (Polar Team Sport System®, Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland), and additional walking mechanics were recorded with Stryd (Stryd Everest 12 Firmware 1.18 Software 3, Stryd Inc., Boulder, CO, USA). The results showed that the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from moderate to almost perfect (ICC = 0.65–0.98) between test repetitions. Some tests could significantly differentiate (p < 0.05) men and women, highlighting better neuromuscular capacity in men and better balance in women. The correlations between tests showed significant convergent validity. The Evaluation of Functionality in the Disabled Population (EFEPD-1.0) battery not only consistently measures functional capacities in people with disabilities, but it can also discriminate between different subgroups within this population.
Reference64 articles.
1. World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF, World Health Organization. 2. (2024, November 05). Disability. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health. 3. (2024, November 05). Eurostat Self-Perceived Long-Standing Limitations in Usual Activities Due to Health Problem by Sex, Age, and Educational Attainment Level. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/hlth_silc_07/default/table. 4. World Health Organization (2011). World Report on Disability 2011, World Health Organization. 5. Participation of People Living with Disabilities in Physical Activity: A Global Perspective;Foster;Lancet,2021
|
|