Review on Laser Shock Peening Effect on Fatigue of Powder Bed Fusion Materials

Author:

Bumba Francisco1ORCID,Morais Paulo2,Batalha Rodolfo2ORCID,Anes Vitor134ORCID,Reis Luis1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

2. ISQ, Taguspark-Oeiras, 2740-120 Porto Salvo, Portugal

3. Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, 1959-007 Lisboa, Portugal

4. Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1549-020 Lisboa, Portugal

Abstract

The ability to manufacture parts with complex geometry by sending a model from CAD directly to the manufacturing machine has attracted much attention in the industry, driving the development of additive manufacturing technology. However, studies have shown that components manufactured using additive manufacturing technology have several problems, namely high tensile residual stresses, cracks, and voids, which are known to have a major impact on material performance (in service). Therefore, various post-treatment methods have been developed to address these drawbacks. Among the post-treatment techniques, laser shock peening (LSP) is currently considered one of the most efficient post-treatment technologies for improving the mechanical properties of materials. In practice, LSP is responsible for eliminating unfavorable tensile residual stresses and generating compressive residual stresses (CRS), which result in higher resistance to crack initiation and propagation, thus increasing component life. However, since CRS depends on many parameters, the optimization of LSP parameters remains a challenge. In this paper, a general overview of AM and LSP technology is first provided. It then describes which parameters have a greater influence during powder bed melting and LSP processing and how they affect the microstructure and mechanical properties of the material. Experimental, numerical, and analytical optimization approaches are also presented, and their results are discussed. Finally, a performance evaluation of the LSP technique in powder bed melting of metallic materials is presented. It is expected that the analysis presented in this review will stimulate further studies on the optimization of parameters via experimental, numerical, and perhaps analytical approaches that have not been well studied so far.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science,Metals and Alloys

Reference115 articles.

1. (2021). Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Terminology (Standard No. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021).

2. Metal Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace: A Review;Gradl;Mater. Des.,2021

3. Characterization and Qualification of LPBF Additively Manufactured AISI-316L Stainless Steel Brackets for Aerospace Application;Pradeep;Trans. Indian Natl. Acad. Eng.,2020

4. Vasco, J.C. (2021). Additive Manufacturing, Elsevier.

5. Additive Manufacturing of Custom Orthoses and Prostheses—A Review;Chen;Addit. Manuf.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3