Is Virtual Rehabilitation Technology Ready to Be Widely Integrated in the Rehabilitation Area? An IT Governance Perspective

Author:

Muria-Tarazón Juan Carlos1ORCID,Gil-Gómez Hermenegildo2,Mesa-Gresa Patricia3ORCID,Gil-Gómez José-Antonio2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Organización de Empresas, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain

2. Instituto Universitario de Automática e Informática Industrial, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain

3. Departamento de Psicobiología, Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia, Universitat de València, Blasco Ibáñez 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain

Abstract

In this work, the authors analyze virtual reality rehabilitation research on strokes in the past 8 years (2015–2022) from the perspective of Information Technology governance (how these initiatives sustain and extend organization strategy), using the “Four Ares” technique that is widely used in other sectors with a proven track record. Are we doing the right things? Are we doing them the right way? Are we getting them done well? Are we getting the benefits? Methods: The bibliography was exhaustively selected for evaluation considering these four questions, covering different aspects of existing evidence on this topic. Results: Some evidence of positive outcomes in patients with a stroke was found, and different approaches, types of measurement, platforms, and methods were analyzed to discern the present situation of research and recommendations. Conclusions: Positive outcomes on motor functions and on motivation and patient adherence to the treatment suggests this is an interesting field to research and examine in the future. Homogeneity on research design and larger samples are key to improving evidence and identifying the best strategies to use.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference85 articles.

1. (2022, March 15). Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation GBD Compare Viz Hub. Available online: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/.

2. Ischemic Stroke;Feske;Am. J. Med.,2021

3. The Growing Use of Virtual Reality in Cognitive Rehabilitation: Fact, Fake or Vision? A Scoping Review;Maggio;J. Natl. Med. Assoc.,2019

4. Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions;Saini;Neurology,2021

5. Williams, G., and Nolte, E. (2018). Organization and Financing of Public Health Services in Europe, WHO Regional Office for Europe.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3