Deep Learning-Assisted Measurements of Photoreceptor Ellipsoid Zone Area and Outer Segment Volume as Biomarkers for Retinitis Pigmentosa

Author:

Wang Yi-Zhong12,Juroch Katherine1,Birch David Geoffrey12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Retina Foundation of the Southwest, 9600 North Central Expressway, Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75231, USA

2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA

Abstract

The manual segmentation of retinal layers from OCT scan images is time-consuming and costly. The deep learning approach has potential for the automatic delineation of retinal layers to significantly reduce the burden of human graders. In this study, we compared deep learning model (DLM) segmentation with manual correction (DLM-MC) to conventional manual grading (MG) for the measurements of the photoreceptor ellipsoid zone (EZ) area and outer segment (OS) volume in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) to assess whether DLM-MC can be a new gold standard for retinal layer segmentation and for the measurement of retinal layer metrics. Ninety-six high-speed 9 mm 31-line volume scans obtained from 48 patients with RPGR-associated XLRP were selected based on the following criteria: the presence of an EZ band within the scan limit and a detectable EZ in at least three B-scans in a volume scan. All the B-scan images in each volume scan were manually segmented for the EZ and proximal retinal pigment epithelium (pRPE) by two experienced human graders to serve as the ground truth for comparison. The test volume scans were also segmented by a DLM and then manually corrected for EZ and pRPE by the same two graders to obtain DLM-MC segmentation. The EZ area and OS volume were determined by interpolating the discrete two-dimensional B-scan EZ-pRPE layer over the scan area. Dice similarity, Bland–Altman analysis, correlation, and linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the agreement between DLM-MC and MG for the EZ area and OS volume measurements. For the EZ area, the overall mean dice score (SD) between DLM-MC and MG was 0.8524 (0.0821), which was comparable to 0.8417 (0.1111) between two MGs. For the EZ area > 1 mm2, the average dice score increased to 0.8799 (0.0614). When comparing DLM-MC to MG, the Bland–Altman plots revealed a mean difference (SE) of 0.0132 (0.0953) mm2 and a coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of 1.8303 mm2 for the EZ area and a mean difference (SE) of 0.0080 (0.0020) mm3 and a CoR of 0.0381 mm3 for the OS volume. The correlation coefficients (95% CI) were 0.9928 (0.9892–0.9952) and 0.9938 (0.9906–0.9958) for the EZ area and OS volume, respectively. The linear regression slopes (95% CI) were 0.9598 (0.9399–0.9797) and 1.0104 (0.9909–1.0298), respectively. The results from this study suggest that the manual correction of deep learning model segmentation can generate EZ area and OS volume measurements in excellent agreement with those of conventional manual grading in RP. Because DLM-MC is more efficient for retinal layer segmentation from OCT scan images, it has the potential to reduce the burden of human graders in obtaining quantitative measurements of biomarkers for assessing disease progression and treatment outcomes in RP.

Funder

Foundation Fighting Blindness

National Eye Institute

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Bioengineering

Reference45 articles.

1. Retinal Laminar Architecture in Human Retinitis Pigmentosa Caused by Rhodopsin Gene Mutations;Aleman;Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci.,2008

2. Disease Boundaries in the Retina of Patients with Usher Syndrome Caused by MYO7A Gene Mutations;Jacobson;Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,2009

3. Ultra-high Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Photoreceptors in Retinitis Pigmentosa and Related Diseases;Witkin;Arch. Ophthalmol.,2006

4. Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Measures of Outer Segment Layer Progression in Patients with X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa;Birch;JAMA Ophthalmol.,2013

5. Reliability of Spectral-Domain OCT Ellipsoid Zone Area and Shape Measurements in Retinitis Pigmentosa;Smith;Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3