Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Prediction of Adverse Long-Term Outcomes in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Correlation with Hemodynamic Measurements Pre- and Post-Pulmonary Endarterectomy

Author:

Gopalan Deepa12ORCID,Riley Jan Y. J.3,Leong Kai’en4ORCID,Alsanjari Senan2,Auger William5ORCID,Lindholm Peter16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

2. Department of Radiology, Imperial College Hospital NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK

3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne 3168, Australia

4. Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia

5. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92037, USA

6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA

Abstract

CT pulmonary angiography is commonly used in diagnosing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This work was conducted to determine if cardiac chamber size on CTPA may also be useful for predicting the outcome of CTEPH treatment. A retrospective analysis of paired CTPA and right heart hemodynamics in 33 consecutive CTEPH cases before and after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) was performed. Semiautomated and manual CT biatrial and biventricular size quantifications were correlated with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and cardiac output. The baseline indexed right atrioventricular volumes were twice the left atrioventricular volumes, with significant (p < 0.001) augmentation of left heart filling following PTE. Except for the left atrial volume to cardiac index, all other chamber ratios significantly correlated with hemodynamics. Left to right ventricular ratio cut point <0.82 has high sensitivity (91% and 97%) and specificity (88% and 85%) for identifying significant elevations of mPAP and PVR, respectively (AUC 0.90 and 0.95), outperforming atrial ratios (sensitivity 78% and 79%, specificity 82% and 92%, and AUC 0.86 and 0.91). Manual LV:RV basal dimension ratio correlates strongly with semiautomated volume ratio (r 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.85) and is an expeditious alternative with comparable prognostic utility (AUC 0.90 and 0.95). LV:RV dimension ratio of <1.03 and ≤0.99 (alternatively expressed as RV:LV ratio of >0.97 and ≥1.01) is a simple metric that can be used for CTEPH outcome prediction.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3