Use of Intracorporeal Durable LVAD Support in Children Using HVAD or HeartMate 3—A EUROMACS Analysis

Author:

Schweiger Martin12ORCID,Hussein Hina3,de By Theo M. M. H.4,Zimpfer Daniel5ORCID,Sliwka Joanna6ORCID,Davies Ben7,Miera Oliver8ORCID,Meyns Bart9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Congenital Cardiovascular Surgery, Pediatric Heart Center, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

2. Children’s Research Center, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

3. Quality and Outcomes Research Unit, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK

4. EUROMACS, EACTS House, Windsor SL4 lEU, UK

5. Department for Heart Surgery, Medical University Graz, Graz A-8010, Austria

6. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Transplantology and Vascular Surgery, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

7. Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne 3052, Australia

8. Department of Congenital Heart Diseases—Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, 13353 Berlin, Germany

9. Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Purpose: The withdrawal of HVAD in 2021 created a concern for the pediatric population. The alternative implantable centrifugal blood pump HeartMate 3 has since been used more frequently in children. This paper analyses the outcome of children on LVAD support provided with an HVAD or HM3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the EUROMACS database on children supported with VAD < 19 years of age from 1 January 2009 to 1 December 2021 was conducted. All patients with an LVAD and either an HVAD or HM3 were included. Patients with missing data on VAD status and/or missing baseline and/or follow up information were excluded. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate survival differences. Analyses were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Results: The study included 150 implantations in 142 patients with 128 implants using an HVAD compared to 28 implants using an HM3. Nine patients (6%) needed temporary right ventricular mechanical support, which was significantly higher in the HM3 group, with 25% (p: 0.01). Patients in the HVAD group were significantly younger (12.7 vs. 14.5 years, p: 0.01), weighed less (45.7 vs. 60 kg, p: <0.000) and had lower BSA values (1.3 vs. 1.6 m2, p: <0.000). Median support time was 204 days. Overall, 98 patients (69%) were discharged and sent home, while 87% were discharged in group HM3 (p: ns). A total of 123 children (86%) survived to transplantation, recovery or are ongoing, without differences between groups. In the HVAD group, 10 patients (8%) died while on support, whereas in 12% of HM3 patients died (p: 0.7). Conclusions: Survival in children implanted with an HM3 was excellent. Almost 90% were discharged and sent home on the device.

Funder

European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3