Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento Interateneo di Scienze, Progetto e Politiche del Territorio, Politecnico di Torino, 10135 Turin, Italy
2. Institute for Renewable Energy, Eurac Research, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
3. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e Ambientale, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35131 Padua, Italy
Abstract
To achieve the ambitious CO2 emission reduction targets set by the Sustainable Development Goals, it is crucial to act on cities. Indeed, cities are responsible for 67% of the world’s primary energy consumption and about 70% of energy-related CO2 emissions. To support the urban energy transition, a broad implementation of zero-emission districts or, even better, positive energy districts (PEDs) is expected. PEDs can be defined as energy-efficient and energy-flexible urban areas that aim to provide a surplus of clean energy to the city by using renewable energies. However, in developing the PEDs concept, it is necessary to consider not only the technical issue of energy systems but also the environmental, social, and economic spheres. To be effective, it is important to provide decision-makers with tools such as Urban Sustainability protocols for PEDs, which can effectively assess the complexity of the impacts a PED might have on other urban transformations from a multi-stakeholder perspective. LEED for Neighborhood Development, BREEAM Communities, and CASBEE for Cities are the most widely used and known protocols in the world for the evaluation of districts. These certification protocols were established before the concept of PEDs and, therefore, are not considered. However, they exhibit some shared characteristics which permit the evaluation of PEDs’ sustainability. In fact, through this research, an attempt is made to analyze how the implementation of sustainability protocols in existing PED projects can improve sustainability, but also how PED projects can improve evaluation systems through interventions that have not been considered so far. To test a methodology that could be extended in future case studies, an analysis of three of the world’s best-known certification systems, LEED-ND, BREEAM-CM, and CASBEE-UD, was conducted on two completed PEDs case studies, Tampere and Salzburg.
Funder
Eurac Research
European Union’s Horizon 2020 program
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference58 articles.
1. IEA (2023, October 10). CO2 Emissions in MT by Sector, World 1990–2018. Available online: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics.
2. Olhoff, A., and Christensen, J.M. (2018). Emissions Gap Report 2018, UNEP DTU Partnership.
3. United Nations Environment Programme (2017). The Emissions Gap Report 2017: A UN Environment Synthesis Report, UN.
4. European Commission (2023, September 12). Economic Appraisal Vademecum 2021–2027—General Principles and Sector Applications. 20 September 2021, Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/guides/2021/economic-appraisal-vademecum-2021-2027-general-principles-and-sector-applications.
5. Urban carbon accounting: An overview;Long;Urban Clim.,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献