Non-Invasive Estimation of Central Systolic Blood Pressure by Radial Tonometry: A Simplified Approach

Author:

Chemla Denis1,Agnoletti Davide23ORCID,Jozwiak Mathieu45ORCID,Zhang Yi67ORCID,Protogerou Athanase D.8ORCID,Millasseau Sandrine9,Blacher Jacques6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. INSERM UMRS 999, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 92350 Le Plessis-Robinson, France

2. Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Research Center, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy

3. Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, Heart Chest and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy

4. Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation CHU de Nice, 06200 Nice, France

5. UR2CA, Unité de Recherche Clinique Côte d’Azur, Université Côte d’Azur, 06200 Nice, France

6. Research Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, Diagnosis and Therapeutic Center, Hôtel-Dieu, 1, Place du Parvis Notre Dame, 75004 Paris, France

7. Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Middle Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai 200072, China

8. Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit, Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece

9. Pulse Wave Consulting, 95320 Saint Leu La Foret, France

Abstract

Backround. Central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) provides valuable clinical and physiological information. A recent invasive study showed that cSBP can be reliably estimated from mean (MBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure. In this non-invasive study, we compared cSBP calculated using a Direct Central Blood Pressure estimation (DCBP = MBP2/DBP) with cSBP estimated by radial tonometry. Methods. Consecutive patients referred for cardiovascular assessment and prevention were prospectively included. Using applanation tonometry with SphygmoCor device, cSBP was estimated using an inbuilt generalized transfer function derived from radial pressure waveform, which was calibrated to oscillometric brachial SBP and DBP. The time-averaged MBP was calculated from the radial pulse waveform. The minimum acceptable error (DCBP-cSBP) was set at ≤5 (mean) and ≤8 mmHg (SD). Results. We included 160 patients (58 years, 54%men). The cSBP was 123.1 ± 18.3 mmHg (range 86–181 mmHg). The (DCBP-cSBP) error was −1.4 ± 4.9 mmHg. There was a linear relationship between cSBP and DCBP (R2 = 0.93). Forty-seven patients (29%) had cSBP values ≥ 130 mmHg, and a DCBP value > 126 mmHg exhibited a sensitivity of 91.5% and specificity of 94.7% in discriminating this threshold (Youden index = 0.86; AUC = 0.965). Conclusions. Using the DCBP formula, radial tonometry allows for the robust estimation of cSBP without the need for a generalized transfer function. This finding may have implications for risk stratification.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3