Does Applying Subsampling in Quantile Mapping Affect the Climate Change Signal?

Abstract

Bias in regional climate model (RCM) data makes bias correction (BC) a necessary pre-processing step in climate change impact studies. Among a variety of different BC methods, quantile mapping (QM) is a popular and powerful BC method. Studies have shown that QM may be vulnerable to reductions in calibration sample size. The question is whether this also affects the climate change signal (CCS) of the RCM data. We applied four different QM methods without subsampling and with three different subsampling timescales to an ensemble of seven climate projections. BC generally improved the RCM data relative to observations. However, the CCS was significantly modified by the BC for certain combinations of QM method and subsampling timescale. In conclusion, QM improves the RCM data that are fundamental for climate change impact studies, but the optimal subsampling timescale strongly depends on the chosen QM method.