Long-Term Use of Insomnia Medications: An Appraisal of the Current Clinical and Scientific Evidence

Author:

Zee Phyllis C.1ORCID,Bertisch Suzanne M.2ORCID,Morin Charles M.3,Pelayo Rafael4,Watson Nathaniel F.5ORCID,Winkelman John W.6,Krystal Andrew D.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA

3. Department of Psychology, Cervo Brain Research Centre, Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada

4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Sleep Medicine Center, Redwood City, CA 94305, USA

5. Department of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

6. Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA

7. Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA

Abstract

While evidence supports the benefits of medications for the treatment of chronic insomnia, there is ongoing debate regarding their appropriate duration of use. A panel of sleep experts conducted a clinical appraisal regarding the use of insomnia medications, as it relates to the evidence supporting the focus statement, “No insomnia medication should be used on a daily basis for durations longer than 3 weeks at a time”. The panelists’ assessment was also compared to findings from a national survey of practicing physicians, psychiatrists, and sleep specialists. Survey respondents revealed a wide range of opinions regarding the appropriateness of using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for the treatment of insomnia lasting more than 3 weeks. After discussion of the literature, the panel unanimously agreed that some classes of insomnia medications, such as non-benzodiazepines hypnotics, have been shown to be effective and safe for long-term use in the appropriate clinical setting. For eszopiclone, doxepin, ramelteon and the newer class of dual orexin receptor antagonists, the FDA label does not specify that their use should be of a limited duration. Thus, an evaluation of evidence supporting the long-term safety and efficacy of newer non-benzodiazepine hypnotics is timely and should be considered in practice recommendations for the duration of pharmacologic treatment of chronic insomnia.

Funder

Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3