Encouraging Patients to Ask Questions: Development and Pilot Testing of a Question Prompt List for Patients Undergoing a Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer

Author:

Rincones Orlando1ORCID,Smith Allan ‘Ben’12ORCID,Chong Peter3,Mancuso Pascal45,Wu Verena Shuwen12,Sidhom Mark24,Wong Karen24,Ngo Diana4,Gassner Paul5,Girgis Afaf12

Affiliation:

1. Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool 2170, Australia

2. South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Liverpool 2170, Australia

3. Lake Macquarie Urology, Newcastle 2290, Australia

4. Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia

5. Department of Urological Surgery, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool 2170, Australia

Abstract

This study assessed the acceptability and feasibility of a question prompt list (QPL) to facilitate informed treatment decision-making in men with suspected localised prostate cancer, which involves values-based choices between options with similar efficacy but different side effects. The QPL was developed through iterative consultation with consumers, clinicians and researchers. Acceptability was assessed using study-specific questions regarding QPL satisfaction and usefulness and qualitative interviews. Feasibility was determined via the proportion of men given the QPL according to medical records and the completion of standardised measures of decisional outcomes. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and univariate statistics. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. Fifty-two men consented; 34 provided data for analysis. The QPL recipients reported moderate–high content satisfaction (70.6%) and perceived usefulness in guiding appointments when receiving biopsy results (64.7%). Two main qualitative themes also indicated the QPL acceptability: (1) the freedom to ask—acceptable timing, flexible usage and usefulness of the QPL, and (2) satisfaction with the QPL content. However, only 18.4% of eligible men received the QPL, indicating limited feasibility. The QPL is safe and acceptable, but further research is needed regarding how to facilitate the uptake of the question prompt list in clinical practice.

Funder

The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group

Cancer Institute NSW

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference37 articles.

1. (2021, August 11). International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Today. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-table?v=2020&mode=cancer&mode_population=continents&population=900&populations=900&key=asr&sex=0&cancer=39&type=0&statistic=5&prevalence=0&population_group=0&ages_group%5B%5D=0&ages_group%5B%5D=17&group_cancer=1&include_nmsc=1&include_nmsc_other=1.

2. The psychological impact of prostate biopsy: Prevalence and predictors of procedure-related distress;Sharp;PsychoOncology,2018

3. Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare;Loeb;J. Urol.,2011

4. Waiting for a cancer diagnosis;McQueen;Cancer Nurs. Prac.,2009

5. The Waiting Game: How Long Are Breast Cancer Patients Waiting for Definitive Diagnosis?;Kovar;Ann. Surg. Oncol.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3