Application of Pure and Modified Polyvinylidene Fluoride Materials for Wastewater Treatment Using UASB Reactor Technologies: A Review
-
Published:2024-04-04
Issue:4
Volume:12
Page:734
-
ISSN:2227-9717
-
Container-title:Processes
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Processes
Author:
Sikosana Mmontshi Lebohang1ORCID, Khoabane Sikhwivhilu Keneiloe2ORCID, Moutloali Richard3ORCID, Madyira Daniel1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa 2. Advanced Materials Division DSI/Mintek Nanotechnology Innovation Centre, Johannesburg 2194, South Africa 3. Institute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, University of South Africa, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
Abstract
Wastewater treatment is now required because of the problems caused by water constraints. Wastewater is anaerobically digested to produce biogas, which can be used as a source of energy for things like lighting and heating. The upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor has been recognized as an important wastewater treatment technology among anaerobic treatment methods. Although their treated effluent typically does not meet most discharge criteria, UASB reactors are generally stated to have a chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction ranging from 60 to 90% for most types of wastewater. In comparison to traditional anaerobic procedures, anaerobic municipal wastewater treatment using membranes can produce higher effluent quality in terms of COD, suspended solids (SSs) and pathogen counts, as well as a steady treatment performance to fulfill strict discharge regulations. The objective of this review was to perform a literature review on parameters to consider when selecting a membrane to include in a UASB reactor. Membranes that are available in the market were compared in terms of both physical and chemical properties. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were found be superior to the others, and their modification also reduced the fouling propensity. When comparing modified PVDF (PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA) to pristine PVDF (116 L·m−2 h−1), a higher pure water flux (5170 L·m−2 h−1) was noted. The main drawback of such modifications could significantly increase the final membrane production costs. Research is still lacking when it comes to research on comparing the membranes and PVDF and UASB reactor technology interaction, including effects of its modification as discussed (stability, longevity of improved flux, etc.
Funder
University of Johannesburg LIRA 2030 Africa Programme Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
Reference66 articles.
1. El Khateeb, M., Hassan, G.K., El Liethy, M.A., El Khatib, K.M., Abdel Shafy, H.I., Hu, A., and Gad, M. (2023). Sustainable municipal wastewater treatment using an innovative integrated compact unit: Microbial communities, parasite removal, and techno economic analysis. Ann. Microbiol., 73. 2. Arthur, P.M., Konaté, Y., Sawadogo, B., Sagoe, G., Dwumfour-Asare, B., Ahmed, I., Bayitse, R., and Ampomah-Benefo, K. (2023). Evaluating the Potential of Renewable Energy Sources in a Full-Scale Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor Treating Municipal Wastewater in Ghana. Sustainability, 15. 3. Vassalle, L., Díez-Montero, R., Machado, A.T., Moreira, C., Ferrer, I., Mota, C.R., and Passos, F. (2020). Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket in microalgae-based sewage treatment: Codigestion for improving biogas production. Bioresour. Technol., 300. 4. Long-term comparison of pilot UASB and AnMBR systems treating domestic sewage at ambient temperatures;Rattier;J. Environ. Chem. Eng.,2022 5. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations;Ozgun;Sep. Purif. Technol.,2013
|
|