Affiliation:
1. Business and Information Technology Department, Kummer College of Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development, Missouri University of Science and Technology, 106D Fulton Hall, 301 W. 14th St., Rolla, MO 65409, USA
Abstract
Since the groundbreaking work by Cleveland and McGill in 1984, studies have revealed the difficulties humans have extracting quantitative data from visualizations as simple as bar graphs. As a first step toward understanding this situation, this paper proposes a mathematical model of the interpretation effort of a bar graph using concepts drawn from eye tracking. First, three key areas of interest (AOIs) are identified, and fixations are modeled as random point clouds within the AOIs. Stochastic geometry is introduced via random triangles connecting fixations within the adjacent key visual regions. The so-called landmark methodology provides the basis for the probabilistic analysis of the constructed system. It is found that the random length of interest in a stochastic triangle has a noncentral chi distribution with a known mean. Unique to this model, in terms of previous landmark applications, is the inclusion of a correlation between fixations, which is justified by physiological studies of the eyes. This approach introduces several model parameters, such as the noncentrality parameter, variance of the fixation cloud, correlation between fixations, and a visualization scale. A detailed parametric analysis examining the dependence of the mean on these parameters is conducted. The paper ties this work to the visualization via a definition of the expected visual measurement error. An asymptotic analysis of the visual error is performed, and a simple expression is found to relate the expected visual measurement error to the key model parameters. From this expression, the influence these parameters have on a visualization’s interpretation is considered.
Reference36 articles.
1. Tufte, E.R. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press. [2nd ed.].
2. Visualization Techniques for Large Datasets;Michalos;J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev.,2012
3. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods;Cleveland;J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,1984
4. Heer, J., and Bostock, M. (2010, January 10–15). Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA.
5. Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction;Shah;Educ. Psychol. Rev.,2002