Morphometric Analysis and Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds Located in Heterogeneous Geographical Units—Case Study: The Buzău River Basin
-
Published:2024-09-01
Issue:17
Volume:16
Page:7567
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Pastor Ioana1, Tanislav Danut1, Nedelea Alexandru2ORCID, Dunea Daniel3ORCID, Serban Gheorghe4, Haghighi Ali Torabi5ORCID, Sabau Daniel4ORCID, Bretcan Petre1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviște, 130004 Targoviște, Romania 2. Department of Geomorphology—Pedology—Geomatics, Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, St. Nicolae Bălcescu, No. 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania 3. Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Food Science, Valahia University of Targoviște, 13, Aleea Sinaia, 130004 Targoviște, Romania 4. Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University, 5–7 Clinicilor, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 5. Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4300, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
Abstract
The present study evaluates selected morphometric characteristics of 39 direct tributaries of the Buzău River (area of 4112 km2) to prioritize development actions in these sub-watersheds, which are distributed in three geographical regions within the full Buzău River watershed: the Carpathian, Subcarpathian, and plains regions. By combining a variable number of morphometric parameters, using various mathematical models, we can evaluate the state of balance or imbalance in a watershed and identify sub-watersheds vulnerable to natural processes. Prioritization was achieved using composite (Cp) values by comparing two scenarios. In the first scenario, 11 derived morphometric parameters were used, and in the second scenario, another 7 parameters were added. The obtained values were grouped into five classes (very high, high, medium, low, and very low). Due to the heterogeneity of relief units among geographical regions, there are classification differences for sub-watersheds among those regions. Watersheds classed as very high priority for intervention actions are located in the Carpathian (SW1, SW2, SW15, SW16) and Subcarpathian areas (SW24, SW30), which are characterized by high relief energy and pronounced slope instability, which leads to an increase in the risk of flooding and land degradation. For comparison, all sub-watersheds in the plains region, are classified as very low or low priority. Since the arithmetic mean is sensitive to extreme values, its use in the calculation of composite (Cp) values causes the values to be “eclipsed” and the sub-watersheds to be placed in different prioritization classes (SW18 and SW34), depending on the analyzed scenario, due to the large number of parameters and classified sub-watersheds.
Reference76 articles.
1. Ha, M.C., Vu, P.L., Nguyen, H.D., Hoang, T.P., Dang, D.D., Dinh, T.B.H., Şerban, G., Rus, I., and Brețcan, P. (2022). Machine Learning and Remote Sensing Application for Extreme Climate Evaluation: Example of Flood Susceptibility in the Hue Province, Central Vietnam Region. Water, 14. 2. Combining radar quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) with distributed hydrological model for controlling transit of flash-flood upstream of crowded human habitats in Romania;Dunea;Nat. Hazards,2023 3. Flood-prone area delimitation using UAV technology, in the areas hard-to-reach for classic aircrafts: Case study in the north-east of Apuseni Mountains, Transylvania;Rus;Nat. Hazards,2016 4. Şerban, G., Sabӑu, D., Bătinaș, R., Brețcan, P., Ignat, E., and Nacu, S. (2020). Water Resources from Romanian Upper Tisa Basin. Water Resources Management in Romania, Springer International Publishing. Print ISBN 978-3-030-22319-9 Online ISBN978-3-030-22320-5. 5. Watershed prioritization for soil and water conservation in Darna River basin: A PCA approach;Pathare;Sustain. Water Resour. Manag.,2021
|
|