Affiliation:
1. Department of Biological Sciences, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA
Abstract
Animals with different life histories budget their intake energy differently when food availability is low. It has been shown previously that hornworm (larva of Manduca sexta), a holometabolous insect species with a short development stage, prioritizes growth at the price of metabolism under food restriction, but it is unclear how hemimetabolous insect species with a relatively long development period budget their intake energy under food scarcity. Here, we use orange head cockroaches (Eublaberus posticus) to investigate this question. We found that for both species under food restriction, rates of metabolism and growth were suppressed, but the degree of reduction was more severe in growth than that of metabolism for cockroaches. Under both free-feeding and food restriction conditions, hornworms allocated a larger fraction of assimilated energy to growth than to metabolism, and cockroaches were the opposite. More importantly, when food availability was low, the fraction of assimilated energy allocated to growth was reduced by 120% in cockroaches, and the energy from growth was channeled to compensate for the reduction in metabolism; but, the fraction of assimilated energy allocated to growth was only reduced by 14% in hornworms. These results suggest that, compared to hornworms, cockroaches prioritize metabolism over growth.
Reference66 articles.
1. Kleiber, M. (1961). The Fire of Life: An Introduction to Animal Energetics, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
2. Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth, Reinhold.
3. Energy uptake and allocation during ontogeny;Hou;Science,2008
4. Kooijman, S.A.L.M. (2000). Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems, Cambridge University Press.
5. Ontogenetic growth: Models and theory;Makarieva;Ecol. Model.,2004
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献