Multi-Criteria Model for Identifying and Ranking Risky Types of Maritime Accidents Using Integrated Ordinal Priority Approach and Grey Relational Analysis Approach

Author:

Sur Ji-Min1,Kim Young-Ju1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of International Trade, College of Economics and International Trade, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Accidents in marine operations are occurring consistently despite government safety initiatives and efforts to lower the number of accidents and the ensuing human casualties. Since each accident type has a different frequency and casualty rate, identifying risky accident types is important to determine the priority for taking necessary risk reduction actions. Usually, a risk is calculated using two criteria, i.e., the frequency and fatality of an accident. However, the accident statistics show that for the last 5 years from 2018 to 2022, the injury rate is more than three times the death rate in maritime accidents in Korean waters. Considering the importance of injury, unlike other previous studies, we perform a risk analysis with three criteria, i.e., frequency, death, and injury to complement the conventional risk calculation methods, which can help decision-makers allocate the limited resources to the riskiest types of accidents in order of priority. In doing so, we employed an integrated ordinal priority approach (OPA) and grey relational analysis (GRA) method to assign proper weight to each criterion and rank eight accident types. We categorized the accidents types into three different groups where safety accidents and collisions were ranked as the most dangerous types. The combined OPA and GRA technique has been effectively applied to other risky industries, as well as the maritime industry. Additionally, the proposed method is suitable for multi-criteria models when each criterion has a different importance. Finally, the method can be integrated into the framework of the risk ranking process to enhance the analysis results.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference51 articles.

1. International Maritime Organization (2018). Revised Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule-Making Process, International Maritime Organization. MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12/Rev.2 9.

2. Pillay, A., and Wang, J. (2003). Technology and Safety of Marine Systems, Elsevier.

3. Veritas, D.N. (2002). Marine Risk Assessment. Offshore Technology Report 2001/063, HSE Books.

4. Benchmarking Road Safety of Montenegro Using Data Envelopment Analysis;Eur. Transp. Int. J. Transp. Econ. Eng. Law,2019

5. Ministry of Employment and Labor (2023). Industrial Accident Statistics in 2002, Ministry of Employment and Labor.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3