Age-Friendly Cycling Infrastructure—Differences and Preferences among 50+ Cyclists

Author:

Jevremović Sreten1ORCID,Trpković Ana1ORCID,Čičević Svetlana1,Čubranić Dobrodolac Marjana1ORCID,Kachadoorian Carol2

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

2. dblTilde CORE, Inc., 105 Jacks Point Road, Oxford, MD 21654, USA

Abstract

In this paper, the needs, attitudes, and perceptions of older (50+) cyclists were examined with the aim of determining the level of comfort, safety, and the way of using different types of cycling infrastructure. Considering that by 2050, 1 in 6 people will be over the age of 65, and that this category of users (particularly cyclists) still receives insufficient attention, the authors believed that in this way, a significant contribution can be made to the existing literature. Data from 389 50+ cyclists were collected through a survey, including Canada, the United States (USA), and Serbia, and analyzed using visual preference testing (VPT), ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis test. The countries were chosen to include certain similarities (traffic characteristics), as well as differences (cultural characteristics), in order to enable an adequate exchange of knowledge, good practice, and experience. The results indicate the existence of differences between these countries, especially regarding the perception of safety and the way of using certain infrastructure in Serbia (e.g., major urban collectors and shared space). Based on the obtained results, a set of general guidelines was proposed for countries with similar traffic and cultural characteristics on how to treat and provide sustainable infrastructure for older cyclists.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference45 articles.

1. Cycling mode choice amongst US commuters: The role of climate and topography;Tyndall;Urban Stud. J.,2020

2. Is Canada’s Commuter Bicycling Population Becoming More Representative of the General Population Over Time? A National Portrait of Bicycle Commute Mode Share 1996–2016;MacEacheron;Act. Travel Stud.,2023

3. City Administration of the City of Belgrade—Secretariat for Transport (2020). Belgrade Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan, City Administration of the City of Belgrade—Secretariat for Transport.

4. (2024, March 15). The League of American Bicyclists, Benchmarking Insights on Older Adults, 2021. Available online: https://data.bikeleague.org/benchmarking-insights-on-older-adults/.

5. Sennechael, J. (2024, March 27). L’état du vélo au Québec. Vélo Mag. Available online: https://www.velomag.com/actualites/letat-du-velo-au-quebec-quand-les-chiffres-parlent/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3