Does Parking Type Preference Behavior Differ According to Whether It Is Paid or Free? A Case Study in Istanbul, Türkiye

Author:

Sarısoy Gürcan12ORCID,Tezcan Hüseyin Onur3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Transportation Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Türkiye

2. Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yalova University, 77200 Yalova, Türkiye

3. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

Parking behavior depends on drivers’ choice of parking type and willingness to pay for parking. Generally, the parking type refers to off-street and on-street parking facilities. The main factors affecting the preference for parking types are driver, vehicle, travel, and parking characteristics. Understanding drivers’ parking type preference behavior and accurately modeling drivers’ tendencies helps develop sustainable parking management policies. This study examines the parking preferences of drivers in Istanbul with binary logit models according to whether they pay for parking. The results of the models show that the number of factors influencing parking type preference is higher for free parking than for paid parking, including driver, vehicle, travel, and parking characteristics. Moreover, some factors in the models affect drivers’ parking type preferences differently for paid and free parking. Namely, low-income individuals tend to use on-street parking when parking is free and off-street parking when it is paid. Conversely, individuals who drive small-size vehicles prefer off-street parking for free parking and on-street parking for paid parking. Individuals who prefer off-street parking for free parking expect shorter walking distances to the final destination and parking duration. On the contrary, individuals who choose on-street parking for paid parking anticipate shorter walking distances to the final destination and parking duration.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference67 articles.

1. Shoup, D.C. (2017). The High Cost of Free Parking, Routledge.

2. Shoup, D. (2018). From Parking Minimums to Parking Maximums in London. Parking and the City, Routledge. [1st ed.].

3. Pojani, D., Corcoran, J., Sipe, N., Mateo-Babiano, I., and Stead, D. (2020). Learning from Parking Reforms in Other Cities. Parking: An International Perspective, Elsevier.

4. Hess, S., and Polak, J.W. (2009). Mixed Logit Modelling of Parking Type Choice Behaviour. Transportation Statistics, JD Ross Publishing.

5. On-Street Parking Search: Review and Future Research Direction;Brooke;Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3